Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Comparative Studies" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Niestabilność komparatystyki
Non-stability of comparative literature
Autorzy:
Hejmej, Andrzej
Tematy:
comparative studies in literature
comparative cultural studies
modern comparative studies
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/969148.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Non-stability of comparative literature The paper focuses on the history and current situation of the discipline of comparative literature, particularly on the condition of comparative studies in literature and comparative cultural studies. A general discussion on comparative literature as ‘indiscipline’ (David Ferris’s concept), based on negative definitions (e.g. Hugo von Meltzl), limitations of comparison and comparability (Paul van Tieghem, René Etiemble, Gayatri Ch. Spivak, Jonathan Culler, Kenneth Reinhard), and individual projects (George Steiner, Daniel-Henri Pageaux, Armando Gnisci, Gayatri Ch. Spivak, Emily Apter, Susan Bassnett), leads to the conclusion that the ‘non-stability’ has been a crucial problem for comparative literature in the course of the last two centuries. Three metaphors are used to describe comparative literature: the Eiffel Tower (the idea of modernity), the World Trade Center (comparative literature as translatio) and the Tower of Babel (translation). In this context, the author argues that modern comparative studies can be defined not as a rigorous intellectual discipline, but rather as a discipline in statu nascendi, as a practice of reading and interpretation
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Non-stability of comparative literature
Niestabilność komparatystyki
Autorzy:
Hejmej, Andrzej
Opis:
The paper focuses on the history and current situation of the discipline of comparative literature, particularly on the condition of comparative studies in literature and comparative cultural studies. A general discussion on comparative literature as ‘indiscipline’ (David Ferris’s concept), based on negative definitions (e.g. Hugo von Meltzl), limitations of comparison and comparability (Paul van Tieghem, René Etiemble, Gayatri Ch. Spivak, Jonathan Culler, Kenneth Reinhard), and individual projects (George Steiner, Daniel-Henri Pageaux, Armando Gnisci, Gayatri Ch. Spivak, Emily Apter, Susan Bassnett), leads to the conclusion that the ‘non-stability’ has been a crucial problem for comparative literature in the course of the last two centuries. Three metaphors are used to describe comparative literature: the Eiffel Tower (the idea of modernity), the World Trade Center (comparative literature as translatio) and the Tower of Babel (translation). In this context, the author argues that modern comparative studies can be defined not as a rigorous intellectual discipline, but rather as a discipline in statu nascendi, as a practice of reading and interpretation.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Research on Journalists in Poland: Problems, Dilemmas and Methodological Challenges. Poznań, Poland, February 9–10, 2023
Autorzy:
Halagiera, Denis
Zadrożniak, Daria
Tematy:
methodology
journalism
journalism studies
comparative studies
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Komunikacji Społecznej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16648145.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Report from seminar: Research on Journalists in Poland: Problems, Dilemmas and Methodological Challenges
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ponowoczesny regionalizm i badania komparatystyczne
Postmodern regionalism and comparative studies
Autorzy:
Rybicka, Elżbieta
Opis:
Postmodern regionalism was one of the most important movements in Polish cultural and literary discourse in the 1990s. Its characteristic features are: reduction or rejection of the national metanarration, tension between centre and regions (from anticentralism to interactional relation), emphasis on difference rather than identity, experience of deterritoriality and dislocation of the regions, locality as a reaction to globalization. This new regionalism needs, however, a new point of view and new research methods. This article presents a proposal for a new approach to local narration in the comparative method, since, as Tadeusz Sławek claims, comparative literary studies are especially predestined to research on the space "between" and on crossing the boundaries. Comparative studies are understood as "placing" (concept of Siegbert Prawer), a comparison of different cultural geographies and their mutual explication. The subject of such comparative studies can be, firstly, Polish borderlands and different local narrations (national, ethnic, regional). Secondly, such regional literature can be considered from the point of view of interregional comparative studies which examine the relation between particular regions and the centre, the canon and the history of national literature.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Cultural comparative studies : interpretation and existence
Komparatystyka kulturowa : interpretacja i egzystencja
Autorzy:
Hejmej, Andrzej
Opis:
New opportunities for pursuance of literary comparative studies, referred to these days as "new/non-classical/cultural" comparative studies, have occurred in the last two decades, particularly after the interventions (by e.g. S. Bassnett, G.C. Spivak) claiming a "death" of the discipline. The author diagnoses the condition of comparative studies in literature, stressing non-commensurability of comparative-study projects and taking into account three currents in comparative studies: traditional (19th-century heritage); interdisciplinary (interdisciplinary comparative studies existing since late 1960s/early 1970s); and, cultural (cultural comparative studies developed since late 1980s/early 1990s). Regardless of how one may approach the enormous tradition of comparative studies, departure from what once was ethno-/eurocentrism appears to be the distinguishing mark of the new paradigm: cultural comparative studies. The author argues in the first place that cultural comparative studies - being a modern form of literary studies - are a nomadic discipline. The suggestion is that the modern comparative studies be approached not as a constantly extending domain of issues and limitless expansion, but rather as an effect of thinking which enables us in today’s world - if Armando Gnisci’s metaphor is acceptable here - to "decolonise ourselves"; as an interpretative practice deeply founded in daily existence.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies