Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "metaphilosophy" wg kryterium: Wszystkie pola


Tytuł:
Spory wokół metafilozofii
Споры вокруг метафилософии
The Disputes About Metaphilosophy
Autorzy:
Zięba, Włodzimierz
Tematy:
метафилософия
дескриптивная метафилософия
нормативная метафилософия
проблематичность
статус метафилософии
metafilozofia
metafilozofia deskryptywistyczna
metafilozofia normatywistyczna
problematyczność
status metafilozofii
metaphilosophy
descriptive metaphilosophy
normative metaphilosophy
controversiality
status of metaphilosophy
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Filozofów Krajów Słowiańskich
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/497198.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Автор поднимает главный для философии Нового времени и современной философии вопрос: вопрос метафилософии. Философия стала сама для себя проблемой. Эта проблематичность касается также метафилософии. Спорным остается вопрос статуса метафилософии как дисциплины автономной относительно философии или же гетерономной. Критический анализ избранных концепций метафилософии позволяет утверждать, что модель деcкриптивный, который de facto не может обойтись без некото-рого a priorii хотя бы в реконструкции истории философии. Метафилософия является поэтому необходимой для сознательного занятия философией.
The author takes up the central problem to contemporary and cutting-edge philosophy, i.e. the problem of metaphilosophy. Philosophy has become a problem for itself. This also applies metaphilosophy problematic. At issue is the status of metaphilosophy as an autonomous discipline to philosophy or heteronomous. Critical analysis of selected concepts of metaphilosophy shows that it is impossible descriptive model, which in fact can’t avoid some a priori, even the reconstruction of the history of philosophy. Metaphilosophy is therefore essential for the conscious practice of philosophy.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Metafilozofia Alberta Einsteina
Albert Einsteins metaphilosophy
Autorzy:
Turek, Józef
Tematy:
Einstein
metafilozofia Einsteina
Einstein's metaphilosophy
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2015961.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The article attempts at giving an adequate characteristics of Albert Einstein as a philosopher. Firstly, it presents a philosophical biography of the founder of the relativity theory. In order to fulfil this aim, first it was shown how, what manner and why Einstein became also a philosopher. Secondly, a reconstruction of Einstein's views was undertaken to show his attitude to philosophy as a special kind of the human knowledge as well as to characterize it at the metalanguage level. Finally, the main topics of his philosophy are in short presented.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Metafilozofia Władimira Erna
Metaphilosophy of Vladimir Ern
Autorzy:
Herbich, Tomasz
Tematy:
Vladimir Ern
metaphilosophy
platonism
Russian religious-philosophical renaissance
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2135652.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Vladimir Ern is often seen as a philosopher that focused mainly on defining the characteristic featuresof Russian philosophy. When his philosophical works are interpreted in such a way, the biggeststress is being put on the fact that he formulated a certain idea of national philosophy, which wasthen transformed by him into a kind of national ideology during the World War I. The article triesto show, that Ern should be treated first of all as an author who considered metaphilosophical issues(and that this fact distinguishes him from the majority of the philosophers of Russian religiousphilosophicalrenaissance, who were mainly interested in solving the metaphysical issues). He focusedon metaphilosophy because he was convinced, that philosophy is a field of the battle between twonotions of the essence of philosophical knowledge which exclude one another. Seen as such, hisphilosophy should be interpreted as an attempt to find a proper way in philosophy and to rejectthe wrong way. The authentic way, which gives a correct answer to the question concerning theessence of philosophical knowledge, was seen by him in Christian Platonism. He tried to show, thatin the works of Plato can be found a certain theory of the spiritual development of man, whichis at the same time a genuine epistemology that shows the way of true philosophical knowledge.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Paradygmaty metafilozofii – historia i współczesność
Paradigms of metaphilosophy – history and the present
Autorzy:
Wawrzynowicz, Andrzej
Tematy:
metaphilosophy
philosophy of philosophy
philosophical cognition
methodology
history of philosophy
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2135650.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Metaphilosophy as a research discipline is concerned with the overall metatheoretical reflection of philosophy on its own subject matter, assumptions, methodology, and goals guiding this form of human intellectual activity. The aim of this article is to present a cross-sectional analysis of the main stages in the historical development of this discipline, and offer a general characterization of the current state of research. The means to achieving this goal of study is a confrontation between two partly competitive and partly complementary paradigmatic approaches to metaphilosophical reflection which currently determine a relatively wide range of interests in this theoretically promising and heuristically fertile field of philosophical analysis.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Metafilozofia negatywistycznej metafizyki unitarnej Leszka Nowaka
Metaphilosophy of Leszek Nowak’s negativistic unitarian metaphysics
Autorzy:
Kiedrowski, Krzysztof
Tematy:
metaphilosophy
analitical philosophy
negativistic unitarian metaphysics
speculative constructivism
Being and Thought
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2135651.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The theme of this paper is Leszek Nowak’s reconstruction and systematization of metaphilosophy of the negativistic unitarian metaphysics described in Being and Thought in four volumes, published in the years 1998, 2004, 2007, 2019. The goal of the article is to contribute to the discussion on the status of metaphilosophy. Metaphilosophy is understood here as a separate dimension of every philosophical conception determining, on the one hand, how we understand the realm of objects (what we postulate), on the other hand, how we choose methods for the construction of theories and ways to legitimize them. The author tries to show that Nowak’s metaphilosophy assumed in negativistic unitarian metaphysics meets exactly this definition of metaphilosophy.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Uwagi o genezie i koncepcjach metafilozofii
Remarks on the origin and conceptions of metaphilosophy
Autorzy:
Szubka, Tadeusz
Tematy:
Carl Gustav Hempel
Morris Lazerowitz
Jerzy Kalinowski
metaphilosophy
philosophy of philosophy
philosophical methodology
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2135649.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Although reflection on the nature of philosophy has constituted an integral part of this discipline from its beginnings, the term „metaphilosophy” referring to such a reflection only made its first appearance in the middle of the twentieth century. In the course of discussions concerning the book by C.J. Ducasse about the subject-matter and method of philosophy, the term was introduced in the United States by C.G. Hempel and M. Lazerowitz, and in Poland by M. Choynowski. Subsequently, two different metaphilosophical programs, which disseminated this category, were put forward by Lazerowitz and J. Kalinowski. They had dissimilar objectives and assumptions, though for both of them a crucial problem was the diversity of philosophical conceptions and persistent disagreements in philosophy.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Philosophical Doubts about reality
Autorzy:
Marsonet, Michele
Tematy:
metaphilosophy
epistemology
metaphysics
science
realism
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Academicus. International Scientific Journal publishing house
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2232465.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
There are many pragmatisms, and it is a litle misleading to present this variegated trend of thought as if it were a monolithic doctrine. The founding fathers, too, were all but unanimous. Peirce was not in agreement with James on many issues. Dewey, in turn, did not like various aspects of both Peirce's and James' philosophy, while C.I. Lewis' views on logic were quite diefrent from those held by Dewey. It should not be surprising, then, to find the same amount of disagreement in contemporary neo-pragmatism, where Rescher and Rorty, who both define themselves pragmatists, display diefrent opinions on most subjects. I shall draw some comparisons between the ideas of these two thinkers. As a maetr of fact there are many pragmatisms, so that it is a litle misleading to present this variegated trend of thought as if it were a monolithic doctrine. The founding fathers, too, were all but unanimous. Peirce was not in agreement with James on many issues. Dewey, in turn, did not like various aspects of both Peirce's and James' philosophy, while C.I. Lewis' views on logic were quite diefrent from those held by Dewey. It should not be surprising, then, to find the same amount of disagreement in today neopragmatism, where Rescher and Rorty, who both define themselves pragmatists, display diefrent opinions on most subjects. In the present section we shall draw some sketchy comparisons between the ideas of these two thinkers. Rescher views the contrast between himself and Rorty as a continuation of the struggle between an objective pragmatism (or “pragmatism of the right”) which includes the triad Peirce-Lewis-Rescher, and a subjective one (or “pragmatism of the left”) 1 which comprises James, the early and middle Dewey, and Rorty. The later Dewey assumes, in this picture, a middle-of-the-road position. While Rorty must certainly be praised for both overcoming the linguistic turn and making pragmatism popular again in American philosophy following several decades of relative forgetfulness, Rescher argues that the Rortyan interpretation of pragmatism is too partial. In particular, by taking Rorty too seriously one is led to believe that pragmatism implies relativism. 1 Marsonet, Michele. “Diefrent pragmatist reactions to analytic philosophy.” New Perspectives on Pragmatism and Analytic Philosophy, edited by Rosa M. Calcaterra, Studies in Pragmatism and Values, 2011, 101-107
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Philosophy and Mediation. A Manifesto
Autorzy:
De Cesaris, Alessandro
Tematy:
metaphilosophy
media theory
mediation
encyclopaedia
philosophy
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/781293.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The current condition of philosophy as a discipline is quite problematic, in particular if we consider its relationship to other human sciences and to other disciplines in general. The philosophical debate appears fragmented, and philosophy itself has lost any specific role in the present scientific landscape. This situation determines a sort of “identity crisis”, whose main consequence is the coexistence of antinomical views about philosophy in the contemporary scientific and public discourse. Starting from this context, the paper aims at providing a description of philosophy as “theory of mediation”. This description does not want to be ‘original’, but rather tries to emphasize an element that is always been rooted in the very essence of philosophy, but that has also often been neglected. Philosophy has always pointed out the necessity to think the in-between of things, their relation and the passage from one to another, rather than just offering a taxonomy or a factual description of the world. In order to prove this point, the paper offers an analysis of some classical texts, in particular of some fragments by Heraclitus and of a passage taken from Hegel’s early writings. A view that rethinks philosophy as “mediology” allows a rehabilitation of philosophy as a specific discipline and as a systematic enterprise, at the same time providing a new framework for the understanding of the relationship between philosophy and other sciences.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
On Nicholas Rescher’s orientational pluralism in metaphilosophy
Autorzy:
Gurba, Marek
Opis:
The article discusses Nicholas Rescher’s metaphilosophical view of orientational pluralism. In his essay "Philosophical Disagreement: An Essay towards Orientational Pluralism in Metaphilosophy" Rescher explains a substantial difference between philosophy and science - namely, that philosophers - differently than scientists - continuously propose and undermine various solutions to the same old problems. In philosophy it is difficult to find any consensus or convergence of theories. According to Rescher, this pluralism of theoretical positions is caused by holding by philosophers different sets and hierarchies of cognitive values, i.e. methodological orientations. These orientations are chosen in virtue of some practical postulates, they are of axiological, normative, but not strictly theoretical character. Different methodological orientations yield different evaluations of philosophical theses and arguments. This article shows that Rescher’s account does not determine clearly acceptable cognitive values. If there are no clear criteria of evaluation of methodological orientations, then the described view seems to be identical to relativism adopting the everything goes rule. In addition, accepting orientational pluralism it is hard to avoid the conclusion that discussions between various philosophical schools are futile or can be reduced to non-rational persuasion.
Artykuł przedstawia metafilozoficzne poglądy Nicholasa Reschera i pewne uwagi krytyczne pod adresem jego koncepcji orientacyjnego pluralizmu. W swym tekście "Philosophical Disagreement : An Essay towards Orientational Pluralism in Metaphilosophy" Rescher wyjaśnia istotną różnicę pomiędzy filozofią a nauką: filozofowie nieustannie proponują i odrzucają różne rozstrzygnięcia tych samych dawnych problemów. W filozofii trudno dostrzec konsens lub konwergencję teorii. Zdaniem Reschera pluralizm stanowisk jest spowodowany tym, że filozofowie przyjmują różne zbiory i hierarchie wartości poznawczych, tj. różne metodologiczne orientacje, wybierane na mocy pewnych postulatów praktycznych i mające charakter aksjologiczny, normatywny. Różne takie orientacje rozmaicie oceniają filozoficzne tezy i argumenty. W artykule pokazuję, że Rescher nie wyznacza jasno zbioru dopuszczalnych wartości poznawczych. Jeśli nie ma kryteriów oceny orientacji metodologicznych, to stanowisko Reschera wydaje się identyczne z tezą radykalnego relatywizmu: "wszystko jest dozwolone". Ponadto, gdy akceptuje się orientacyjny pluralizm, trudno jest uniknąć konkluzji mówiącej, że dyskusje pomiędzy różnymi szkołami filozoficznymi są daremne lub redukowalne do nieracjonalnej perswazji.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies