Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Pedagogiczna Biblioteka Wojewódzka im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Lublinie Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaPedagogiczna Biblioteka Wojewódzka im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Lublinie
Zmień bibliotekę

Wyszukujesz frazę "Danieluk, Barnaba" wg kryterium: Autor

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Expertise is in the eye of the beholder : financial advisor evaluations and client satisfaction as a result of advisor recommendations
    Autorzy:
    Kicia, Mariusz
    Danieluk, Barnaba
    Stasiuk, Katarzyna
    Muda, Rafał
    Opis:
    Clients' satisfaction with financial advice provided by professional advisors depends on how this advice has fulfilled their expectations and goals. However, once a recommendation is made, a client is unable to predict and evaluate the real financial outcome of the advisor's proposal. In such a case, she/he can base her/his assessment on the characteristics ascribed to the financial advisor: her/his epistemic authority (competence) and level of caring. Additionally, clients expect to receive a "tailor-made" solution that takes into account her/his individual needs and characteristics. In the present study, we asked participants to evaluate financial experts who had recommended risky vs safe investments. The recommendations were congruent or incongruent with the clients' risk tolerance (high vs low). The kind of recommendation influenced the participants' evaluations of the advisors (and as a result, the clients' perceived satisfaction) only for low-risk tolerance clients. For these clients, investment recommendations that were not adjusted to their levels of risk tolerance led to lower evaluations of the advisors and consequently to lower evaluation of satisfaction with their visits. These lower evaluations regarded both dimensions: the interpersonal aspec t (caring) and competence in the field of finance (epistemic authority). Such incongruence between risk tolerance and the riskiness of the recommendation did not affect high-risk tolerance clients' advisor evaluations.
    Dostawca treści:
    Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Expertise is in the Eye of the Beholder – Financial Advisor Evaluations and Client Satisfaction as a Result of Advisor Recommendations
    Autorzy:
    Danieluk, Barnaba
    Muda, Rafał
    Kicia, Mariusz
    Stasiuk, Katarzyna
    Tematy:
    client satisfaction
    risk tolerance
    professional competence
    agency and communion
    epistemic authority
    Pokaż więcej
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Czasopisma i Monografie PAN
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2122032.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
    Opis:
    Clients’ satisfaction with financial advice provided by professional advisors depends on how this advice has fulfilled their expectations and goals. However, once a recommendation is made, a client is unable to predict and evaluate the real financial outcome of the advisor’s proposal. In such a case, she/he can base her/his assessment on the characteristics ascribed to the financial advisor: her/his epistemic authority (competence) and level of caring. Additionally, clients expect to receive a “tailor-made” solution that takes into account her/his individual needs and characteristics. In the present study, we asked participants to evaluate financial experts who had recommended risky vs safe investments. The recommendations were congruent or incongruent with the clients’ risk tolerance (high vs low). The kind of recommendation influenced the participants’ evaluations of the advisors (and as a result, the clients’ perceived satisfaction) only for low-risk tolerance clients. For these clients, investment recommendations that were not adjusted to their levels of risk tolerance led to lower evaluations of the advisors and consequently to lower evaluation of satisfaction with their visits. These lower evaluations regarded both dimensions: the interpersonal aspect (caring) and competence in the field of finance (epistemic authority). Such incongruence between risk tolerance and the riskiness of the recommendation did not affect high-risk tolerance clients’ advisor evaluations.
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies