- Tytuł:
- A worldwide test of the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching
- Autorzy:
-
Ilustrisimo, Ruby
Meier, Zdeněk
Gjoneska, Biljana
Gillath, Omri
Živná, Kristýna
Kačmár, Pavol
Feldman, Gilad
Tavel, Peter
Kowal, Marta
Vally, Zahir
Małecki, Wojciech P.
Arriaga, Patrícia
Skakoon-Sparling, Shayna
Röer, Jan P.
Pavlović, Zoran
Batres, Carlota
Paruzel, Mariola
Ross, Robert M.
Tejada, Julian
Cong, Chin Wen
Ai, Ting
Vaidis, David
Stewart, Suzanne L. K.
Salvador, Cristina E.
Wisnuwardhani, Dian
Du, Hongfei
Püski, Marcell
Ehinmowo, Michael I.
Barzykowski, Krystian
Sakman, Ezgi
Charles, Deborah Y.
Kim, Young-Hoon
Roberts, S. Craig
Yonemitsu, Fumiya
Adamkovič, Matúš
Frias Armenta, Martha
Lucas, Marc Y.
Malinakova, Klara
Chen, Jane Minyan
Impett, Emily
Villanueva-Moya, Laura
Butcher, Natalie
Tuominen, Jarno
Behnke, Maciej
Baník, Gabriel
Grigoryev, Dmitry
Chwiłkowska, Patrycja
Freitag, Raquel
Groyecka-Bernard, Agata
Adu, Peter
Eastwick, Paul W.
Baucom, Katherine J.
Vaughn, Leigh Ann
Spasovski, Ognen
Kocur, Mirosław
Meza, Eva M.
Park, Haeyoung Gideon
Chittham, Phakkanun
Tu, Eric
Gallyamova, Albina
Espinosa, Natalia M.
Lu, Jackson G.
Özdoğru, Asil A.
Escribano, Daniela A.
Aubert-Teillaud, Benjamin
Dizon, Mikaela
Grafe, Franca
Misiak, Michal
Stanton, Sarah C. E.
Akintola, Aderonke A.
Sparks, Jehan
Apriliawati, Denisa
Selcuk, Emre
Expósito, Francisca
Coles, Nicholas A.
Swami, Viren
Cheon, Jeong Eun
Krishna, Maatangi
Žídková, Radka
Gunaydin, Gul
Gkinopoulos, Theofilos
Szaszi, Barnabas
Takashima, Kaito
Muise, Amy
Al-Shawaf, Laith
Beaulieu, Elizabeth Z.
Sorokowska, Agnieszka
Meißner, Sofia
Labor, Paul Danielle
Novak, Lukas
O, Jiaqing
Finkel, Eli J.
Ropovik, Ivan
Ribeiro, Gianni
Ćubela Adorić, Vera
Corral-Frias, Nadia S.
Copping, Lee T.
Sorokowski, Piotr
Yamada, Yuki - Opis:
- Ideal partner preferences (i.e., ratings of the desirability of attributes like attractiveness or intelligence) are the source of numerous foundational findings in the interdisciplinary literature on human mating. Recently, research on the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching (i.e., Do people positively evaluate partners who match vs. mismatch their ideals?) has become mired in several problems. First, articles exhibit discrepant analytic and reporting practices. Second, different findings emerge across laboratories worldwide, perhaps because they sample different relationship contexts and/or populations. This registered report - partnered with the Psychological Science Accelerator - uses a highly powered design (N = 10,358) across 43 countries and 22 languages to estimate preference-matching effect sizes. The most rigorous tests revealed significant preference-matching effects in the whole sample and for partnered and single participants separately. The “corrected pattern metric” that collapses across 35 traits revealed a zero-order effect of β = .19 and an effect of β = .11 when included alongside a normative preference-matching metric. Specific traits in the “level metric” (interaction) tests revealed very small (average β = .04) effects. Effect sizes were similar for partnered participants who reported ideals before entering a relationship, and there was no consistent evidence that individual differences moderated any effects. Comparisons between stated and revealed preferences shed light on gender differences and similarities: For attractiveness, men’s and (especially) women’s stated preferences underestimated revealed preferences (i.e., they thought attractiveness was less important than it actually was). For earning potential, men’s stated preferences underestimated - and women’s stated preferences overestimated - revealed preferences. Implications for the literature on human mating are discussed.
- Dostawca treści:
- Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Artykuł