Autor: Kemling, Jared - Prolib Integro

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Reflective Judgment and Symbolic Functions: On the Possibility of a Phenomenology of Person
Autorzy:: Kemling, Jared
Tematy:: Cassirer
Kant
reflective judgment
personalism
phenomenology
transcendental anthropology; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/451551.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: The following paper seeks to examine whether, from the standpoint of a transcendental idealist, it is possible to have a phenomenology that can adequately disclose the nature and activity of person. First I establish that symbols are intuitive concretizations of the activity of person/Geist, and thus symbols are available to phenom- enological description. Then I raise the question of whether reflective judgment can be understood as a part of a possible phenomenology. I come to the conclusion that yes, the process of reflective judgment is phenomenologically available; reflective judgment offers an experience of “what it is like to be a person” (meaning a transcendental process of symbol creation). However, it is clear that reflective judgment must borrow a rule from phenomenal/determinate experience in order to imaginatively analogize the transcendental creativity of person. Thus, all that is available to phenomenology is an analogy of being person, and not person itself.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Toward a “Cultural Philosophy”: Five Forms of Philosophy of Culture
Autorzy:: Kemling, Jared
Tematy:: cultural philosophy
bildung
hadot
anderson
cassirer; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/985702.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: This work argues that an opportunity is being missed by the philosophical tradition, especially within philosophy of culture: an opportunity not just to philosophize “about” culture, but to embody culture and put it into practice. It argues that philosophy itself is a powerful form of culture – one that needs to be better understood and more explicitly practiced. To highlight this blind spot, the work introduces a distinction between “philosophy of culture,” and “cultural philosophy.” Cultural philosophy should be better explored by the discipline for two reasons: a clearer understanding of cultural philosophy would benefit all practitioners of philosophy; also, a philosopher of culture who engages cultural philosophy will be a more effective philosopher of culture. The goal of the project is to highlight the possibility of (and value in) a “cultural philosophy,” and to serve as something of a prolegomenon toward further work in that area.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Antoine Mooij’s Phenomenology of Symbolization: Synthesizing Lacan and Cassirer
Autorzy:: Kemling, Jared
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/451505.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Preview: /Review:Antoine Mooij, Lacan and Cassirer: An Essay on Symbolisation, translated by Peter van Nieuwkoop (Leiden: Brill Rodopi, 2018), 256 pages./ The central argument of Lacan and Cassirer: An Essay on Symbolisation is that each thinker approaches the problem of symbolization in a way that ultimately complements the other; “that their opposing views are in fact mutually complementary, indeed correcting each other in essential ways” (LC, 4). Mooij argues that Cassirer, “gives primacy to meaning, to signification” (LC, 3), whereas Lacan, “draws attention… to the symbolising ‘signifiers’ even before a meaning has been established” (LC, 4). In other words, while both are concerned with symbolization, Cassirer emphasizes the signification (the meaning) whereas Lacan gives primacy to the signifier (the sign/symbol itself, rather than the meaning it signifies). Mooij believes that these two views can and should be integrated into what he calls a “third theory of representation” (LC, 4), that synthesizes these two complementary approaches. Mooij will later christen this third theory that he seeks to develop as a “phenomenology of symbolization” (LC, 173).
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Kemling, Jared" wg kryterium: Autor