- Tytuł:
- Conceptual replication study of fifteen JDM effects: Insights from the Polish sample
- Autorzy:
-
Sobkow, Agata
Surowski, Marcin
Olszewska, Angelika
Antoniewska, Nina
Barcik, Katarzyna
Bartkiewicz, Urszula
Brzeska, Agnieszka
Brzozowska, Adrianna
Budrewicz, Oliwia
Choja, Jakub
Choma, Kamila
Chorbotowicz, Patrycja
Filimoniak, Michalina
Filip, Łukasz
Gambuś, Paweł
Gierlik, Weronika
Gonczar, Tomasz
Goryczka, Katarzyna
Góra, Maksymilian
Haczek, Marta
Hetmańczuk, Weronika
Holka, Zuzanna
Janosz, Aneta
Kikowska, Nikola
Kołcun, Joanna
Kozłowska, Zuzanna
Kujawińska, Monika
Kuleszczyk, Marcin
Lach-Galińska, Aleksandra
Latacz, Katarzyna
Ławniczak, Adam
Majewska, Katarzyna
Makowska, Klaudia
Mamzer, Marta
Marciniszyn, Iga
Masternak, Adam
Matuszek, Magdalena
Mehr, Jonasz
Miela, Ewelina
Mleczko, Monika
Morga, Paulina
Niemczyk, Magdalena
Ostrowski, Damian
Pełdiak, Jagoda
Piotrowicz, Kamil
Płuciennik, Antoni
Ryśkiewicz, Oskar
Sekuła, Weronika
Sikora, Małgorzata
Sikora, Natalia
Sitko, Daria
Sobczak, Agata
Sosenko, Julia
Stando, Sonia
Starek, Katarzyna
Ślak, Łukasz
Świtała, Jagoda
Świtniewska, Natalia
Tyc, Agnieszka
Urban, Olga
Wcisło, Natalia
Wiśniewska, Katarzyna
Wodzińska, Joanna
Zabiełło, Aleksandra
Żygadło, Monika
Zaleskiewicz, Tomasz
Traczyk, Jakub - Tematy:
-
replication
decision making
reproducibility
pre-registration
risk perception - Pokaż więcej
- Wydawca:
- Polska Akademia Nauk. Czasopisma i Monografie PAN
- Powiązania:
- https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/55796019.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
- Opis:
- We conducted pre-registered replications of 15 effects in the field of judgment and decision making (JDM). We aimed to test the generalizability of different classical and modern JDM effects, including, among others: less-is- better, anchoring, and framing to different languages, cultures, or current situations (COVID-19 pandemic). Replicated studies were selected and conducted by undergraduate psychology students enrolled in a decision-making course. Two hundred and two adult volunteers completed an online battery of replicated studies. With a classical significance criterion (p < .05), seven effects were successfully replicated (47%), five partially replicated (33%), and three did not replicate (20%). Even though research materials differed from the originals in several ways, the replication rate in our project is slightly above earlier reported findings in similar replication projects. We discuss factors that may underlie replication results (success vs. failure). We also stress the role of open science practices such as open data, open research materials, pre-registration, and registered reports in improving the replicability of results in the JDM field.
- Dostawca treści:
- Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł