Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Williams, David" wg kryterium: Autor


Tytuł:
Models, Metaphors and Symbols for Information and Knowledge Systems
Autorzy:
Williams, David
Tematy:
DIKW
knowledge management
intellectual capital
organizational learning
systems
data
information
knowledge
wisdom
truth
records
evidence
belief
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę Cognitione
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/474902.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
A literature search indicates that Data, Information and Knowledge continue to be placed into a hierarchical construct where it is considered that information is more valuable than data and that information can be processed into becoming precious knowledge. Wisdom continues to be added to the model to further confuse the issue. This model constrains our ability to think more logically about how and why we develop knowledge management systems to support and enhance knowledge-intensive processes, tasks or projects. This paper seeks to summarise development of the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom hierarchy, explore the extensive criticism of it and present a more logical (and accurate) construct for the elements of intellectual capital when developing and managing Knowledge Management Systems.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pod powierzchnią świata, poza historią – ku kontrhistorii odpadów i ziemi jałowej
Underworld, underground, underhistory. Towards a counterhistory of waste and wastelands
Autorzy:
Williams, David
Tematy:
współczesne praktyki artystyczne
śmieci
resztki
odpady
artyści ziemi
aktywiści
konceptualiści
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1390998.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The article is a collage of texts concerning the phenomena of waste in context underworld, underground and underhistory. Starting from environmentalism, cultural studies, sociology and psychoanalysis, the author moves towards a wide array of contemporary art practices. ‘Garbage’, ‘trash’, ‘refuse’, ‘waste’ and ‘rubbish’ are presented as complex and ambivalent metaphorical terms employed to organize and legitimize the parts of life normally desired to be overlooked. Waste: the excessive remainder of production and consumption, detritus of that which is deemed ‘use-less’ in ‘progress’; the informe material that has been reappropriated and recycled in countless artworks since the collages of Cubism, Dada and Surrealism’s détournements of objets trouvés. The author goes deeper: in order to present a global consciousness, he introduces a spectrum of artists and art works concerned with waste’s constitutive presence in and implications for contemporary landscapes, both literal and cultural. His description includes land artists, environmental artists, activists and conceptualists, such as Alan Sonfist, Agnes Denes, Agnès Varda, Edward Burtynsky, Maurizio Cattelan, and Mierle Laderman Ukeles.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Models, Metaphors and Symbols for Information and Knowledge Systems
Autorzy:
Williams, David
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu - National Louis Univeristy
Cytata wydawnicza:
Williams, D., Models, Metaphors and Symbols for Information and Knowledge Systems. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI), 2014, vol. 10, nr 1 : Knowledge Management Special Issue: Connecting Theory and Practice. Ed. by P. Lambe, s. 79-107
Opis:
A literature search indicates that Data, Information and Knowledge continue to be placed into a hierarchical construct where it is considered that information is more valuable than data and that information can be processed into becoming precious knowledge. Wisdom continues to be added to the model to further confuse the issue. This model constrains our ability to think more logically about how and why we develop knowledge management systems to support and enhance knowledgeintensive processes, tasks or projects. This paper seeks to summarise development of the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom hierarchy, explore the extensive criticism of it and present a more logical (and accurate) construct for the elements of intellectual capital when developing and managing Knowledge Management Systems.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Centrum Otwartej Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
All-sky medium energy gamma-ray observatory : exploring the extreme multimessenger universe
Autorzy:
Kocveski, Daniel
da Silva, Rui Curado
Guiriec, Sylvain
Agudo, Ivan
Hays, Elizabeth
Kanbach, Gottfried
Beacom, John
D'Ammando, Filippo
Doro, Michele
Digel, Seth
Williams, David
Funk, Stefan
Giordano, Francesco
Patricelli, Barbara
Coppi, Paolo
Zoglauer, Andreas
Manousakis, Antonios
Giuliani, Andrea
Dominguez, Alberto
Beckmann, Volker
Auricchio, Natalia
Paliya, Vaidehi S.
Oberlack, Uwe
Klimenko, Alexei V.
Vianello, Giacomo
Kerr, Matthew
Grefenstette, Brian
Neilson, Naoko Kurahashi
Harding, Pat
Boettcher, Markus
Mitchell, John
Zampieri, Luca
Longo, Francesco
Grenier, Isabelle
Gelfand, Joseph
Walter, Roland
Hartmann, Dieter
Holder, Jamie
Rando, Riccardo
Hernanz, Margarita
Thompson, David
Gouiffes, Christian
Kierans, Carolyn
Marcowith, Alexandre
Georganopoulos, Markos
Grove, Eric
Moiseev, Alexander
Prescod-Weinstein, Chanda
Kopp, Joachim
Lommler, Jan
Omodei, Nicola
Krawczynski, Henric
Moss, Michael
Zane, Silvia
Wood, Matthew
Linden, Tim
Petropoulou, Maria
Nakazawa, Kazuhiro
Dietrich, Stefano
Zhang, Haocheng
Knodlseder, Jurgen
De Becker, Michaël
Finke, Justin
Griffin, Sean
Cenko, S. Brad
Morcuende, Daniel
Stawarz, Łukasz
Bambi, Cosimo
Barrio, Juan Abel
Ajello, Marco
Fukazawa, Yasushi
Bozhilov, Vladimir
Harding, Alice
Lenain, Jean-Philippe
Fryer, Chris
Blumer, Harsha
Del Sordo, Stefano
Tajima, Hiro
Jones, Sam
Wulf, Eric
Uhm, Lucas
Meyer, Eileen
Cardillo, Martina
Kubo, Hidetoshi
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Hewitt, Jack
Anton, Sonia
Gasparrini, Dario
Bolotnikov, Aleksey
Caputo, Regina
Wadiasingh, Zorawar
Castro, Daniel
Zimmer, Stephan
Bernard, Denis
Moskalenko, Igor
Kislat, Fabian
Racusin, Judith
Bastieri, Denis
Campana, Riccardo
Fields, Brian
Venters, Tonia
Ohno, Masanori
Porter, Troy
Baring, Matthew
Ansoldi, Stefano
Buckley, Jim
Smith, Karl
Ciprini, Stefano
Sanchez-Conde, Miguel A.
Younes, George
De Angelis, Alessandro
Prandini, Elisa
Laurent, Philippe
Li, Hui
Inglis, Andrew
Buson, Sara
Orlando, Elena
Caroli, Ezio
Lovellette, Michael
Ferrara, Elizabeth
Saz Parkinson, Pablo
Tanaka, Yasuyuki
Krizmanic, John
Charles, Eric
Metcalfe, Jessica
Hui, Michelle
Wang, Xilu
Woolf, Richard
Ribó, Marc
Bloser, Peter
Chen, Wenlei
Bozzo, Enrico
Shawhan, Peter
Schirato, Richard
Boggs, Steven
Stephen, John B.
McConnell, Marc
Smith, Jacob
Meyer, Manuel
McEnery, Julie E.
Marcotulli, Lea
Pittori, Carlotta
Foffano, Luca
Cheung, Teddy
Oikonomou, Foteini
Tatischeff, Vincent
Stamerra, Antonio
Stumke, Inga
Lien, Amy
Perkins, Jeremy
Bednarek, Wlodek
van der Horst, Alexander
Di Mauro, Mattia
Tomsick, John
Mizuno, Tsunefumi
Mignani, Roberto
The, Lih-Sin
Bottacini, Eugenio
Martinez, Manel
López, Marcos
Briggs, Michael
Mazziotta, M. Nicola
Kaufmann, S.
Rodi, James
Zhang, Bing
Parker, Lucas
Di Venere, Leonardo
Baldini, Luca
Barres, Ulisses
Bissaldi, Elisabetta
Ojha, Roopesh
Tibaldo, Luigi
Johnson, Robert
Takahashi, Hiromitsu
Cutini, Sara
Vestrand, Tom
Rani, Bindu
Kargaltsev, Oleg
Shrader, Chris
Strong, Andy
Pohl, Martin
Álvarez, José-Manuel
De Nolfo, Georgia
Otte, Nepomuk
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Artykuł
Tytuł:
What Support do Systematic Reviews Provide for Evidence-informed Teaching about Software Engineering Practice?
Autorzy:
Budgen, David
Brereton, Pearl
Williams, Nikki
Drummond, Sarah
Tematy:
systematic review
education
provenance
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Politechnika Wrocławska. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/953058.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Background: The adoption of the evidence-based research paradigm by software engineering researchers has created a growing knowledge base provided by the outcomes from systematic reviews. Aim: We set out to identify and catalogue a sample of the knowledge provided by systematic reviews, to determine what support they can provide for an evidence-informed approach to teaching about software engineering practice. Method: We undertook a tertiary study (a mapping study of systematic reviews) covering the period to the end of 2015. We identified and catalogued those reviews that had findings or made recommendations that were considered relevant to teaching about industry practice. Results: We examined a sample of 276 systematic reviews, selecting 49 for which we could clearly identify practice-oriented findings and recommendations that were supported by the data analysis provided in the review. We have classified these against established software engineering education knowledge categories and discuss the extent and forms of knowledge provided for each category. Conclusion: While systematic reviews can provide knowledge that can inform teaching about practice, relatively few systematic reviews present the outcomes in a form suitable for this purpose. Using a suitable format for presenting a summary of outcomes could improve this. Additionally, the increasing number of published systematic reviews suggests that there is a need for greater coordination regarding the cataloguing of their findings and recommendations.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies