Temat: Neoplatonism - Prolib Integro

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Recenzja książki: Porfiriusz z Tyru O wegetarianizmie (Περὶ ἀποχῆς ἐμψúχων), wprowadzenie, przekład i komentarz Ewa Osek, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Sub Lupa, Warszawa 2018, ss. 460
Book Review: Porfiriusz z Tyru O wegetarianizmie (Περὶ ἀποχῆς ἐμψúχων), wprowadzenie, przekład i komentarz Ewa Osek, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Sub Lupa, Warszawa 2018, pp. 460
Autorzy:: Czerwińska, Jadwiga
Tematy:: Porphyry
vegetarianism
neoplatonism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/648714.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: This is the first Polish translation of Porphyry’s of Tyre text done by Ewa Osek. Except for the translation, the book contains the Greek text, a comprehensive introduction to the content of the work, a description of manuscripts and editions, as well as extensive and comprehensive comments on the translated text. Appendix and indexes are also included in the book.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Magistri basiorum : neoplatońskie wariacje na temat katullańskich pocałunków : od Giovanniego Pontana do Jacobusa Pontanusa
Magistri basiorum : neoplatonic variations on the subject of the Catullan kisses : from Giovanni Pontano to Jacobus Pontanus
Autorzy:: Urban-Godziek, Grażyna
Wydawca:: Instytut Filologii Klasycznej UW
Dostawca treści:: Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

Inne

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Aristotle’s Topics in the Greek Neoplatonic Commentaries on the Categories
Autorzy:: Militello, Chiara
Tematy:: Categories
commentaries
dialectic
Neoplatonism
Topics; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633482.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: This paper lists and examines the explicit references to Aristotle’s Topics in the Greek Neoplatonic commentaries on the Categories. The references to the Topics by Porphyry, Dexippus, Ammonius, Simplicius, Olympiodorus, Philoponus and David (Elias) are listed according the usual prolegomena to Aristotle’s works. In particular, the paper reconstructs David (Elias)’s original thesis about the proponents of the title Pre-Topics for the Categories and compares Ammonius’, Simplicius’ and Olympiodorus’ doxographies about the postpraedicamenta. Moreover, the study identifies two general trends. The first one is that all the commentators after Proclus share the same general view about: the authenticity of the Topics, Aristotle’s writing style in them, the part of philosophy to which they belong, their purpose, their usefulness and their place in the reading order. The second one is that whereas Porphyry, Dexippus and Simplicius use the Topics as an aid to understanding the Categories, Ammonius, Olympiodorus and David (Elias) do not.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Marsilio Ficino i Platoński Charmides
Autorzy:: Piotrowska, Paulina
Tematy:: Marsilio Ficino, temperantia, Renaissance neoplatonism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/636255.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Marsilio Ficino and Plato’s Charmides The following article, devoted to Ficino’s interpretation of Plato’s Charmides, consists of two parts. The first one is an introduction to Ficino’s comment. It brings up Ficino’s stylistics and the place of Charmides among the Plato’s dialogues. It seems that the decision to translate the works of Plato was not accidental. Th e philosopher’s views on governance perfectly justified the strong power of Cosimo de’ Medici in Florence. Poliziano praised his rule in his own preface to Charmides. Charmides, in turn, is an interesting dialogue because it was followed by Ficino’s censorship where the philosopher tackles Plato’s homoerotic fascinations. Th e translator, so honest and conscientious in other translations, this time decides to pare down the content of the dialogue. However, a comment written by him becomes a valuable compensation for these shortcomings. Ficino’s main philosophical notions (above all the prisca theologia doctrine) bloom in every passage of the paper. The author interweaves the wisdom of Arab mystics with the wisdom of ancient Greek mystics in order to reconcile these thoughts with the Christian revelation. Particularly interesting is the psychosomatic approach to human nature, that is the interdependence of the health of body and soul. As by the means of sophrosyne full harmony is to be discovered between them, we can even reach immortality. We are like Adam Kadmon, who, though imperfect, can improve his own and the world’s nature. The second part of the paper is a translation of Ficino’s synopsis of the dialogue, in which the author explains what can be understood under the term sophrosyne. Temperance needs to be instilled into a man’s mind early, as early as the patient is given medication. It should be given especially to young people, to those from noble families and to the beautiful. Physical beauty, in particular, hinders striking the right balance but, on the other hand, it can also stimulate insight into the beauty of the soul. The form allows us to explore the idea. When the violent desires are tamed, it is easier to balance all other activities. Th at is the reason why “moderation is best”, as Cleobulos of Lindos would say. When both the soul and body are healed, we achieve a harmonious consonance. In the spirit of this harmony, Pythagorean magical practices agree with the thoughts of Avicenna and Hippocrates’s medical practice to end up with the mysteries of Moses. That is what they have achieved – Enoch, Elijah and St. John the Evangelist. Enriched with necessary footnotes, the translation seems to represent an important example of Italian Renaissance interpretation of Platonic thought.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Hedonistyczny wątek w platońskim Fedonie – Uproszczenie Olimpiodora
Hedonistic Motif in Plato’s Phaedo – Olympiodorus’ Simplification
Autorzy:: Pacewicz, Artur
Tematy:: Neoplatonism
Plato
Olympiodorus
hedonism
Phaedo; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/938387.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: While the aim of the present paper is to analyze Olympiodorus’ commentary to Plato’s Phaedo, particular attention will be paid here to the role of hēdonē. The first part of the text presents the four conceptions of the pleasure that can be found in Plato’s dialogue. Although pleasure does not play the most prominent role either in the Plato’s dialogue or in the Neoplatonic commentary, Olympiodorus’ attitude to this issue reveals an important change and difference between the philosophical views of Plato and those of Olympiodorus. The latter does not seem to discern the possibility that pleasure can have its spiritual dimension (which Plato regards as possible). Thus, the experience of hēdonē is reduced solely to the sphere of the senses and even in this area its role needs to be minimized: in this form it has to be carefully measured and controled. Furthermore, Olympiodorus does not see that so-called hedonistic calculus: whilst it is not strictly speaking connected with virtuous actions, it still can have some significance for the the philosopher’s life.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: Why Aquinas Stopped Commenting on Boethius’s De Trinitate
Autorzy:: Ugwuanyi, Faustinus Ik.
Tematy:: Aquinas
Boethius
De Trinitate
Trinity
Neoplatonism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: International Étienne Gilson Society
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507300.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: The article is an attempt to answer the question of why Aquinas stops his commentary on Boethius’s De Trinitate at question six, article four, whereas this is before the point in the treatise where Boethius gets to the heart of the subject matter. The author shows that Aquinas (1) decides to do so because the treatise cannot afford him the means of demonstrating the existence of the Trinity, (2) holds that, although rational explanations could be given in terms of proof of God’s existence, one cannot come to the knowledge of the truth of the existence of the Trinity by reason alone, and (3) concludes that, although we cannot prove the doctrine of the existence of the Trinity through philosophical demonstration, we can, however, show that this doctrine and other doctrines known through the light of faith are not contradictory.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Il male in sé e il nulla in Proclo
Evil Itself and Nothingness in Proclus
Autorzy:: Napoli, Valerio
Tematy:: Proclus
Evil
Nothingness
Non-being
Neoplatonism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1178736.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: In his reflection on the nature of evil, the Neoplatonic philosopher Proclus affirms that evil itself (to autokakon) is “also beyond the absolute non-being” (epekeina kai tou mēdamōs ontos). With this assumption, he intends to reinforce the thesis of the non-existence of absolute evil, conceived as totally separate from good, and contrasted with the collateral and parasitic existence of evil mixed with good. He thus maintains a distinction between absolute evil and relative evil, conceived with reference to the distinction between absolute non-being (i.e., nothingness) and relative non-being. In Proclus, the thesis of the non-existence of absolute evil is presented as a necessary consequence of the non-dualist theory of evil in the sphere of a protology that identifies the first Principle of all things in the primary Good (identical to the supra-essential One), and which aims to reconcile the absolute primacy of the latter with the presence of evil in some orders of reality.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 8.

Tytuł:: Olympiodorus and Damascius on the Philosopher’s Practice of Dying in Plato’s Phaedo
Autorzy:: Mouzala, Melina G.
Tematy:: Plato
Phaedo
Neoplatonism
death
soul
purification
separation; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633492.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: This paper presents Olympiodorus’ and Damascius’ explanations of the philosopher’s practice of dying in Plato’s Phaedo. It also includes a presentation of Ammonius’ exegesis of the practice of death (meletē thanatou). The Neoplatonic commentators discern two kinds of death, the bodily or physical death and the voluntary death. Olympiodorus suggests that bodily death is only an image of voluntary death and cannot be recognized as an original death, because original death presupposes the preparation for death and the constant effort for the purification of the soul during the philosopher’s life-time. Only preparation for death and purification can ensure the complete separation of the soul from the body. Relative to this distinction is that between apothnēskein and tethnanai; these infinitives denote the dual meaning of death: death as an event or a process and death as a state. Our study examines thoroughly the subtle distinctions made by Olympiodorus and Damascius and offers a comparative analysis of the two definitions of death as well as that of purification. It reaches the conclusion that apothnēskein is a necessary condition of tethnanai, i.e. of a definitive release and parting of the soul from the body. On the other hand, the process of eventual purification, a notion which betrays the religious character of purification, can be identified with apothnēskein, which is the practice of dying by the true philosopher. Finally, our study also emphasizes and explains the difference between the voluntary philosophical death and the voluntary unphilosophical suicide; the latter guaranteeing only bodily or physical death.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 9.

Tytuł:: The objective character of virtues in Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology
Autorzy:: Papiernik, Joanna
Tematy:: Marsilio Ficino
Platonism
Neoplatonism
ethics
virtue ethics; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/600474.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Marsilio Ficino did not write a methodical, complete treatise on ethics, but the ethical questions are discussed in most of his writings, including his opus magnum entitled Theologia Platonica. The most important sources for Ficino’s ethical considerations are Platonic and Neoplatonic texts and this is strongly reflected in Theologia; one of the aspects of this dependence regards the nature of virtues: they are seen as unchangeable, indivisible and that is why they are objective. The main purpose of the paper is to present the objective character of virtues in Platonic Theology by invoking their definition, role and status with references to Plato’s works.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 10.

Tytuł:: Unwritten Doctrine of Pythagoras in Hermias of Alexandria
Autorzy:: De Campos, Rogério G.
Tematy:: Hermias
unwritten philosophy
written philosophy
Pythagoreanism
Neoplatonism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28408722.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: In Hermias’ commentary on Phaedrus (In Platonis Phaedrum Scholia), it is possible to identify several direct references to the philosophers and pre-Socratic doctrines, including Pythagoras. We point out to three references to Pythagoras in Hermias: (1) Pythagoras is characterized as an unwritten philosopher, (2) there is a special connection with the divinities and Muses, and (3) there is a special connection with the Phaedrus dialogue, revealed by the affinity between Pythagoras and Socrates. We show how the explicit references to Pythagoras in Hermias constitute a certain method of interpreting Platonism: as a philosophy manifested in writing, but which, at the same time, values the unwritten tradition, represented especially by Pythagoras and Socrates. We also demonstrate how the references translated and examined here reveal the image of this Neoplatonic Pythagoras of Hermias, an image which is not necessarily in tune with the oldest doxography, and which permits the reevaluation of Plato’s position as a philosopher who sought to combine unwritten doctrines with his explicit activity as a writer.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Neoplatonism" wg kryterium: Temat