Temat: Parmenides - Prolib Integro

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Existence and non-existence : ontological contemplations on Parmenides
Byt i niebyt : wokółparmenidesowe rozmyślania ontologiczne
Autorzy:: Lipiec, Józef
Opis:: Starting from the judgement of Parmenides that there is existence but non-existence is not, the author discusses the issues of existence in Parmenides. This subject is examined not only as an ontological problem (what is existence per se), but also as an epistemological problem. Using Parmenides’ thesis of the cognisability of "non-existence", the author considers the problem of the legitimacy of the concept of "non-existence" (how is it possible to perceive something which is not there), making use of the conception of modi existentiae (real existence, intentional existence). The problem of the complexity and simplicity of existence is also considered. Alongside the perception of existence as that which is absolutely simple, he also considers as possible the equally gentle, emergent and organicistic interpretation of the conception of existence according to Parmenides. At the same time, the contemplations in the article aim to show in what way the problem of existence as formulated by Parmenides has for centuries inspired philosophy and continues to do so.
Dostawca treści:: Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Parmenides Fragment B 3
Autorzy:: Marcinkowska-Rosol, M.
Tematy:: GREEK PHILOSOPHY
PARMENIDES
PRESOCRATICS; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/702685.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: The article discusses possible meanings of Parmenides' fr. B 3 Diels-Kranz (to\ ga\r au)to\ noei=n e)sti/n te kai\ ei)=nai) and its grammatical structure. Special attention is given to the question of continuity between that fragment and fr. B 2, 7-8.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Kosmologia Parmenidesa z Elei - rekonstrukcja, interpretacja, kontekst
-
Autorzy:: Biernat, Przemysław
Opis:: The subject of my thesis is the cosmologic theory of Parmenides of Elea. The first chapter contains reconstruction and interpretation of philosopher’s opinions on the structure of the universe and nature of the natural phenomena, which I develop on the support of remaining fragments and posterior writers’ commentaries. In the second chapter I consider what was the cosmological function of goddesses’ figures, which appear in philosopher’s utterances. At last, in the third chapter I give a view on Parmenides’ cosmologic theories in confrontation with cosmology of Hesiod and orphic cosmology which is implicit in the text preserved on the Derveni papyrus. I have accepted and adopted the A. Finkelberg’s reconstruction of Parmenidean cosmological model, which I however supplement with elements of implicit physics. Trying to investigate the relation between basic forms (pháos and nýks) and their derivatives (but not mixtures), I come to the conclusion that in Parmenides’ theory forms are to be found in two modes of being: dense and loose. Through the analysis of lexis which accompany the description of Dike, Ananke and Moira figures, I ascertain that these goddesses are in fact a metaphor of Parmenidean definition’s of truth internal necessity, in what I differ from other scholars, who – like A. Mourelatos – assumed that we have here to do with a kind of polymorph deity. Such interpretation is however erroneous, because it suggests that the existence of external power which makes truth the truth is necessary; and in fact it is not, because the truth (essence or what really is) is the sufficient reason for itself on the strength of its definition. External sufficient reason (cause) is however necessary in phenomenal world and that’s why Parmenides in the center of his cosmos places the daímōn, which governs the míksis of forms (fr. B 12). She remains anonymous, because, if given, proper name would suggest that she is not the real, existent power, but mere metaphor, the same as Dike, Ananke, Moira or Eros. Here I also call attention on the fact that Parmenides conceived the interaction of two forms in terms of biological, or even sexual, mingling.Comparison of Parmenidean cosmology with Hesiodic have to indicate intrinsic polemic content of prologue of Parmenides’ poem. I suggest that Parmenides wanted to criticize cosmologic theory which admits the mere absence (so in itself nothing) underlying structured universe to be its cosmogenetic source or foundations. I indicate also points of contact between Parmenides’ theories and some ideas present in cosmotheogony of Derveni (dualistic principles, intellectual character of demiurgic act) to cast new light on the origins of Greek philosophical thought.
Przedmiotem niniejszej pracy jest teoria kosmologiczna Parmenidesa z Elei. Pierwszy rozdział poświęcony jest rekonstrukcji i interpretacji poglądów Eleaty na budowę kosmosu i naturę zjawisk zmysłowo postrzegalnych w oparciu o zachowane fragmenty poematu oraz komentarze późniejszych autorów. Rekonstrukcja obejmuje również rozdział drugi, w którym zastanawiam się nad rolą, jaką pojawiające się w wypowiedziach filozofa bóstwa, pełniły w ramach jego modelu kosmologicznego. Wreszcie w rozdziale trzecim proponuję spojrzenie na poglądy Parmenidesa w świetle kosmologii Hezjoda i kosmologii orfickiej obecnej implicite w tekście zachowanym na papirusie z Derveni.W rekonstrukcji modelu kosmologicznego przychyliłem się do interpretacji A. Finkelberga, rozszerzając ją jednak o elementy implicytnej fizyki. Próbując dociec relacji między formami podstawowymi (pháos i nýks) a ich pochodnymi (lecz nie mieszaninami), dochodzę do wniosku, że zdaniem Parmenidesa formy występowały w dwóch stanach skupienia, zagęszczonym i rozrzedzonym. Analizując leksykę towarzyszącą postaciom Dike, Ananke i Moiry, dochodzę do przekonania, iż mamy w ich przypadku do czynienia z metaforą wewnętrznej konieczności przyjętej przez Parmenidesa definicji prawdy, w czym różnię się od innych uczonych, którzy, jak A. Mourelatos, widzieli tutaj wielopostaciową boginię. Takie rozumienie jest jednak błędne, ponieważ zakłada istnienie zewnętrznej siły, która prawdę czyniłaby prawdą – taka jest natomiast zbędna, ponieważ prawda o rzeczy sama dla siebie stanowi rację dostateczną na mocy swej definicji. Zewnętrzna racja dostateczna (przyczyna) konieczna jest natomiast w świecie zjawisk, dlatego Parmenides umieszcza w centrum swego kosmosu daímōn, która kieruje míksis form (fragm. B 12). Pozostaje ona anonimowa, ponieważ nazwanie jej imieniem własnym mogłoby zasugerować, że nie jest ona realną siłą, lecz metaforą w takim samym stopniu, jak Dike, Ananke, Moira czy Eros. Przy okazji zwracam również uwagę na ujmowanie przez Parmenidesa mieszania się dwóch form w kategoriach biologicznych (seksualnych).Porównanie kosmologii Parmenidesa z kosmologią Hezjoda ma ujawnić tkwiące w prologu utworu Eleaty polemiczne ostrze, wymierzone w koncepcję kosmologiczną, która stawia u podłoża kosmogenezy czyste nic, brak, za który starożytni uważali cháos. Natomiast wskazanie na punkty styczne między myślą Parmenidesa a pewnymi rozwiązaniami obecnymi w kosmoteogonii z Derveni (dualizm pryncypiów, intelektualny charakter procesu demiurgicznego) miało na celu rzucić nowe światło na początki greckiej myśli filozoficznej.
Dostawca treści:: Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

Inne

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Structure and Relevance of the Aristotelian Critic toward the Eleatics (Ph. I 2–3)
Structure and Relevance of the Aristotelian Critic toward the Eleatics (Ph. I 2–3)
Autorzy:: Volpe, Enrico
Tematy:: Aristotle
Physics
Parmenides
Melissus
Eleatism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633475.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: The first book of the Aristotelian Physics may be considered as a sort of general introduction to the whole work. In particular, chapters 2 and 3 result very interesting for the foundation of the science of nature according to Aristotle; indeed, in these two chapters, the Stagirite criticizes the position of the Eleates Parmenides and Melissus. These two philosophers are considered as those who claim that change does not exist because the existence of the not-being is impossible to suppose. For this reason, since the Eleates deny that motion and change really exist, the refutation of their thesis results essential for the logical and ontological foundation of the Aristotelian science of nature. This paper wants to make light on the argumentations that Aristotle uses against Parmenides and Melissus. Indeed, since the Stagirite makes often use of his philosophical categories (like substance; the categories, the continuum and so on), it seems that his critics sound a little bit anachronistic. In many passages of the text is seems that Aristotle “simply” replace the presupposition of the Eleatic philosophy (i.e. the being is and not-being does not) with the thesis of the evidence of moving and plurality, in general. The aim of this contribution is to reflect on the critics present in Ph. I 2–3 in order to underline the importance of the Eleatic philosophy for the Aristotelian science of nature.
The first book of the Aristotelian Physics may be considered as a sort of general introduction to the whole work. In particular, chapters 2 and 3 result very interesting for the foundation of the science of nature according to Aristotle; indeed, in these two chapters, the Stagirite criticizes the position of the Eleates Parmenides and Melissus. These two philosophers are considered as those who claim that change does not exist because the existence of the not-being is impossible to suppose. For this reason, since the Eleates deny that motion and change really exist, the refutation of their thesis results essential for the logical and ontological foundation of the Aristotelian science of nature. This paper wants to make light on the argumentations that Aristotle uses against Parmenides and Melissus. Indeed, since the Stagirite makes often use of his philosophical categories (like substance; the categories, the continuum and so on), it seems that his critics sound a little bit anachronistic. In many passages of the text is seems that Aristotle “simply” replace the presupposition of the Eleatic philosophy (i.e. the being is and not-being does not) with the thesis of the evidence of moving and plurality, in general. The aim of this contribution is to reflect on the critics present in Ph. I 2–3 in order to underline the importance of the Eleatic philosophy for the Aristotelian science of nature.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Melisso e il problema del vuoto: apologia e/o fraintendimento del monismo parmenideo?
Melissus and the Problem of the Void: Apology and/or Misapprehension of the Parmenidean Monism?
Autorzy:: Volpe, Enrico
Tematy:: Melissus
Parmenides
Leucippus
void
monism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/938296.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: With respect to Parmenides’ thought Melissus was regarded as a dissident thinker already in antiquity. His polemical introduction of the concept of void and the relative idea of infinite Being seemed particularly controversial. The aim of the present paper is to examine the origins of the Melissian understanding of void in order to trace its philosophical genesis to the criticism of the Atomist Leucippus. According to the philosopher from Abdera, the Eleatic fundamental principles had to conform to the obviousness of bodies’ motion, which is why the Eleatic not-Being had to be understood as void. Melissus took issue with this view and criticized the idea of the void’s reality by means of a methodical argument. In the course of doing so, the philosopher from Samos distorted the original Parmenidean ontology, which is why his theories were often criticized severely as theoretically weak.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: Melissos z Samos – doksografia i fragmenty
Melissos of Samos – Doxography and Fragments
Autorzy:: Wesoły, Marian A.
Tematy:: Melissos
Parmenides
Eleatic arguments
monism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1178755.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: There are several recent and noteworthy studies on the testimonies and fragments of Melissos of Samos: Laks-Most (2016), Brémond (2017). Furthermore, one can learn a great deal about Melissos from the lectures and discussions undertaken in the framework of “Eleatica 2012” (Mansfeld A. et al. 2016). When taken together, these studies enable us to fully appreciate Melissos’ original work in terms of its sources, its audacious arguments and its later criticisms. Melissos is here presented as a spokesman of the Eleatic school in an order that aims to do justice to the ancient testimonies that relate and refute his arguments as well as to the verbatim fragments (these are given here in the original). For the sake of clarity, however, various secondary testimonies have been omitted.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Monism in Aristotle’s Metaphysics I.3–5
Autorzy:: Johansen, Thomas Kjeller
Tematy:: Parmenides
Aristotle
monism
materialism
causes; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2016432.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Scholars have often seen Parmenides as entirely opposed to earlier materialistic philosophy. In this paper I argue that what is more striking in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Book I is the degree of continuity that he sees between Parmenides and the material monists. I explore this coupling of Parmenides with the material monists to understand better what he takes to be distinctive and problematic with Parmenides’ monism.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 8.

Tytuł:: Recenzja książki W.K. Gródka OFM Jedno, wiele, nic u Zenona i Gorgiasza. Analiza terminów ἕν, πολλά, οὐδέν w kontekście teorii Parmenidesa:, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jana Pawła II, 2018
Review of W.K. Gródeks book Jedno, wiele, nic u Zenona i Gorgiasza. Analiza terminów ἕν, πολλά, οὐδέν w kontekście teorii Parmenidesa:, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jana Pawła II, 2018
Autorzy:: Pacewicz, Artur
Tematy:: Parmenides
Zeno
Gorgias
Zenon
Gorgiasz; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1621485.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Recenzja książki W.K. Gródka "Jedno, wiele, nic..."
Review of W.K. Gródek's book "Jedno, wiele, nic..."
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 9.

Tytuł:: The Meaning of Being
Autorzy:: Xinyan, Zhang
Tematy:: being
metaphysics
ontology
Heraclitus
Parmenides; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2130838.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: With many different concepts, definitions, equations and examples, the author tries in this article to tell one and the same thing: The meaning of the ontological concept “being”, the most asked and answered question in philosophy. The author puts forward here the notion: “Being” might mean nothing more or less than Parmenides’ one in Heraclitus’ flux. He holds that the one and the flux are the same in reality. And we may not experience Heraclitus’ flux if without the one and can also not understand Parmenides’ one if without the flux.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 10.

Tytuł:: Parmenide e l’Uovo argenteo degli Orfici in Simplicio, Damascio e Proclo
Autorzy:: Licciardi, Ivan Adriano
Tematy:: Egg
Orphism
Parmenides
Proclus
Damascius
Simplicius; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28408733.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: When commenting on Aristotle Ph. 1.3, 187a1, Simplicius in Ph. 1.3, 146, 29–147,2 establishes an equivalence between the shining «silver egg» (ὤεον ἀργύφεον) of Orpheus (fr. 70 Kern) and the Parmenidean being or, rather, one of the determinations with which Parmenides, in the section of his Poem devoted to the so-called Way of Truth, indicates the ἐόν, i.e., «resembling the mass of a well-rounded sphere» (εὐκύκλου σφαίρης ἐναλίγκιον ὄγκωι – DK 28 B 8.43). The equivalence established here is found in the great digression about Parmenides (in Ph. 142, 28–148, 24), where Simplicius puts forward an interpretation of Parmenides that identifies the Parmenidean being-one (τὸ ἓν ὄν) with the intelligible (τὸ νοητόν), which, in another passages of the same commentary, is also qualified with the metaphysical concept of “unified” (τὸ ἡνωμένον) that is taken from Damascius. The aim of the present paper is to trace back the Neo-Platonic assumptions of this identification. In particular, we will focus on Damascius Pr. 2.55.40, 14–19 and 3.123.160, 1–3 Westerink, since these passages contain insights into the Orphic theology that is referred to as “usual”, “common” or “rhapsodic”, as well as a contextual “translation” of various Orphic concepts (e.g. ὤεον ἀργύφεον) in terms of Neo-Platonic metaphysics. The metaphysical transposition of the mythical image of the silver egg goes back, however, to Proclus (in Ti. 1.428, 8–9), who assumes the identity between Plato’s being (“being in the primary sense”, τὸ πρώτως [...] ὄν) and the Orphic egg (ταὐτὸν τό τε Πλάτωνος ὂν καὶ τὸ Ὀρφικὸν ὠόν). One cannot, at the same time, exclude a priori the possibility that the Orphic motif of the silver egg circulated in the Magna Graecia of Parmenides already from at least the 6th century BC. It is possible, as Colli hypothesised, that already Ibycus (who certainly knew Orpheus, fr. 25 Page) betrays a certain knowledge of it in fr. 4.4–5 Page, where we find the expression ἐν ὠέωι ἀργυρέωι. This article demonstrates that Proclus and Damascius embedded the Orphic concept of ὤεον ἀργύφεον into their Neo-Platonic metaphysics by showing its potential for speculative order.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Parmenides" wg kryterium: Temat