Temat: Plato, knowledge - Prolib Integro

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Plato and the Classical Theory of Knowledge
Autorzy:: Pacewicz, Artur
Tematy:: Plato, knowledge; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/665193.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: In this paper, the notion of the classical theory of knowledge is analysed with reference to its primary source – the philosophy of Plato. A point of departure for this analysis is the description of the classical theory of knowledge presented by Jan Woleński in his book Epistemology (but it can be also found in the works of other researchers devoted to epistemology). His statements about Plato are examined in the context of Plato’s thought. The dialogues Apology, Gorgias, Meno, fragments of the Republic, Theaetetus, Timaeus and the testimonies about the so-called agrapha dogmata are especially taken into consideration.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Epistemology in Plato's "Theaetetus" and Rorty's hermeneutics
Epistemologia w "Teajtecie" Platona a hermeneutyka Rorty’ego
Autorzy:: Józefowicz, Mikołaj
Opis:: Celem niniejszej pracy jest analiza oraz interpretacja Teajteta Platona. Głównym tematem dzieła Platona jest próba zdefiniowania pojęcia wiedzy. Trzy różne definicje wiedzy są rozważane w dialogu: wiedza jako percepcja, wiedza jako sąd prawdziwy oraz wiedza jako sąd prawdziwy ściśle ujęty. Proponowana interpretacja dzieła Platona opiera się na założeniu czytania Teajteta w oddzieleniu od pozostałych dialogów platońskich. Analizując Teajteta będę korzystał z motywów zaczerpniętych z filozofii pragmatycznej. Będę utrzymywał, że Platon w ramach Teajteta stosuje podział na wiedzę praktyczną i teoretyczną. Dodatkowo wyróżnia filozofię jako oddzielną metodę dochodzenia do prawdy. Najważniejszymi tezami mojej interpretacji są: utożsamienie działalności filozoficznej z prowadzeniem konwersacji oraz porównanie epistemologicznej koncepcji Platona do pojęcia hermeneutyki z Filozofii a zwierciadła natury Richarda Rorty’ego.
The aim of this work is the analysis and interpretation of Plato’s Theaetetus.The main subject of Plato’s work is an attempt to define a concept of knowledge. Three different definitions are considered in the dialogue: knowledge is perception, knowledge is true judgement, knowledge is true judgement with an account. The proposed interpretation of Plato’s work is based on a premise of reading Theaetetus separately from the rest of Plato’s dialogues. While analysing Theaetetus I will be using motives form pragmatic philosophy. I will be claiming, that Plato within the framework of Theaetetus applies distinction of “knowing how” and “knowing what”.In addition, he detaches philosophy as different method of accessing the truth. The most important theses of my interpretation are: identifying the philosophical activity with conducting a conversation and comparing Plato’s epistemological conception to concept of hermeneutic from Richard Rorty’s Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.
Dostawca treści:: Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

Inne

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: Dvokrilnost istine u Divljoj patki: Platon, Ibsen i Krleža
The Two Winged Truth in The Wild Duck: Plato, Ibsen, and Krleža
Autorzy:: Tomljenović, Ana
Tematy:: bsen
Plato
Krleža
dialogue
knowledge; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1890684.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Questioning the commonly held assumption in critical reception that Ibsenʼs symbol of the wild duck was influenced by Darwinʼs theory, I want to argue that the wild duck flew into Ibsenʼs play all the way from Platoʼs aporetic dialogue The Theaetetus. Following Lacanʼs reading of Plato, I want to examine the connection between the Socratic position towards knowledge – especially the rupture between knowledge and truth – and the treatment of dramatic dialogue in Ibsenʼs The Wild Duck and Krležaʼs The Glembays.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Wisdom - Knowledge - Belief. The Problem of Demarcation in Platos Phaedo
Autorzy:: Pacewicz, Artur
Wydawca:: Instytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Polskie Forum Filozoficzne
Opis:: Artur Pacewicz
The aim of the present paper is to show how Plato suggested demarcating between knowledge and other kinds of human intellectual activities. The article proposes to distinguish between two ways of such a demarcation. The ﬁrst, called ‘the external demarcation’, takes place when one differentiates between knowledge and non-knowledge, the rational and non-rational or the reasonable and non-reasonable. The second, called ‘internal’, marks the difference within knowledge itself and could be illustrated by the dif- ference between the so called hard and soft sciences. The analyses lead to the following conclusions. Plato refers to the whole of human intellectual activity as doxa, which is divided into two spheres. The ﬁrst of them is knowledge proper whose criterion is phronesis. Three other kinds of doxa are derived from knowledge proper: 1) the traditional peri phuse¯os investigation (called also sophia); 2) popular doxai concerning virtues; 3) wisdom of the antilogikoi. The difference represents the external demarcation. There may be, however, a difference in the scope of knowledge proper (the internal demarcation). If the peri phuseos investigators were able to explain the ﬁeld of values, the result of their investigation could be acknowledged as knowl- edge, although it would still be characterized as inferior due to its being based on senses. What is interesting about knowledge proper is that it is not ﬁrm and reliable but only hypothetical. It does not determine the skeptical reading of the Phaedo but it indicates that Plato has just begun his own philosophical project (which is still in progress) and the knowledge presented in the dialogue is his ﬁrst positive suggestion how to solve the problem of demarcation.
Dostawca treści:: Repozytorium Centrum Otwartej Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Word in Education: Good, Bad and Other Word
Autorzy:: Carr, David
Tematy:: Education
Word
Soul
Reason
Plato
Christianity
Knowledge; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/454158.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: St John’s Gospel identifies logos, translated as English ‘Word’, as the divine source of the wisdom or truth of the Christian message, if not with the godhead as such. However, given the cultural and intellectual influence of Greek thought on early Christian literature, one need not be surprised that these (and other) theological or metaphysical associations of Word are almost exactly replicated and prefigured in the dialogues of Plato, for whom formation of the divine aspect or element of human soul clearly turned upon access to or participation in the wisdom of logos. This paper explores the moral and spiritual connections between logos or Word, reason and soul in such Platonic dialogues as Gorgias, Republic and Theaetetus as well as the implications of conceiving education as the pursuit of such Word for ultimate human flourishing.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: The World is Too Much with Us: Apparent and Real Platonic Views of Intelligence and Knowledge for Education
Autorzy:: David, Carr
Tematy:: intelligence
knowledge
Plato
selective vs egalitarian education; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/454218.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: From Plato onwards, notions of intelligence and ability – and of their implications for human flourishing – have had a chequered educational history. Following some attention to the influence of IQ theory on (arguably neo-Platonic) post-WW2 British selective state education, this paper proceeds to consider the more egalitarian educational reaction to such selection from the nineteen-sixties onwards. However, while appreciative of the individual and social benefits of such greater educational equality, the paper proceeds to ask whether the notions of individual growth, fulfilment and flourishing that they may seem to entail are entirely appropriate for the human world of tomorrow
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Dialectic, Drama and Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Charmides
Autorzy:: Mouzala, Melina G.
Tematy:: dialectic
drama
self-knowledge
Plato
Charmides
Socrates; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: International Étienne Gilson Society
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507272.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Charmides is a dialogue highly indicative of the importance that the prologues to Plato’s works have for our understanding of the whole spirit and philosophical content of each dialogue as a whole. It is representative of the Platonic tendency to always combine philosophical content with dramatic form through narrative and drama, in order to enhance the reader’s and audience’s insight into the inquiries of his philosophical work. Following this line of presentation, the prologue of Charmides prefigures the understanding of the central themes of the dialogue; focusing on the depiction of Socrates as a therapist and of Dialectic as a therapy or a kind of remedy, which through the process of dialectical engagement and interaction reestablishes the relation of each interlocutor to his own self. The Apollonian ideal of self-knowledge (know thyself) is construed as a “greeting” of the god to worshipers who enter the temple, not as a moral counsel or as a piece of advice. This distinction implies the difference between a knowledge conveyed from without and a knowledge discovered by insightful inner search of one’s self. Within the passages 165c to 175a, sōphrosunē is presented and examined as “the knowledge of what one knows and what one does not know.” It has been claimed that in this part of the dialogue, the Socratic model of self-knowledge is subjected by Plato to the Socratic elenchus, where he attempts to make a criticism of it. I believe that this section of the dialogue is an extended excursus, aimed towards introducing and examining a model of self-knowledge different from that of Socrates, Critias’ model of self-knowledge. This model of self-knowledge poses a whole series of philosophical problems; the relation between the subject and the object of knowledge, the possibility of their identification or the distinction between them, the possibility of the existence of an internal and external object of knowledge, the relation of this model of self-knowledge with other kinds or domains of knowledge, and the question whether external knowledge or knowledge of other knowledges is a constituent of knowledge of knowledge. The question of the possibility of knowledge of knowledge is not definitely rejected, especially if we consider that in all of this discussion there is a hint towards the way in which philosophy works and relates to other kinds of knowledge. I believe, however, that in the last part of the dialogue, where the knowledge of good and bad emerges, Plato again meets Socrates and becomes reconciled with him. The only knowledge that is useful and beneficial is knowledge of good and bad. In this way Plato chooses to put forward a self-conscious model of self-knowledge, which does not presuppose, as Critias’ model does, the critical examination of knowledge or the critical distance from knowledge. This self-conscious model of self-knowledge is connected with the knowledge of good and bad. On the one hand doing of good presupposes knowledge of good and bad and on the other, “doing one’s own things” presupposes self-knowledge. The possibility of knowing good and bad is ensured by each person, either through looking deep within himself or by orientating towards the Idea of the Good itself.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 8.

Tytuł:: Argument and Performance: Alcibiades’ Behavior in the Symposium and Plato’s Analysis in the Laws
Argument and Performance: Alcibiades’ Behavior in the Symposium and Plato’s Analysis in the Laws
Autorzy:: Erler, Michael
Tematy:: Plato
Alcibiades
Symposium
Laws
knowledge
performance
argument
weakness; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633616.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Argument and literary form, and how they both relate to each other, are crucial aspects of any interpretation of the Platonic dialogues. Plato the author and Plato the philosopher always work hand in hand in that Plato the author tries to serve Plato the philosopher. It is, therefore, an appropriate principle for approaching the study of Plato’s philosophy to take into account the literary aspects of the dialogues and to ask how Plato’s literary art of writing could possibly support his philosophical message and, for instance, to consider what this relation means in the context of the debate about developementalism versus unitarianism in Plato’s philosophy. In the present paper , I argue that the performance of the characters plays an important role in this context. I discuss various passages in the Laws which analyse the weakness of the will and I compare what Plato says there with the performance of Alcibiades in the Symposium. I conclude that the passages in the Laws can be read as a kind of commentary on Alcibiades’ behavior and I consider what this relation means in the context of the debate about developementalism versus unitarianism in Plato’s philosophy.
Argument and literary form, and how they both relate to each other, are crucial aspects of any interpretation of the Platonic dialogues. Plato the author and Plato the philosopher always work hand in hand in that Plato the author tries to serve Plato the philosopher. It is, therefore, an appropriate principle for approaching the study of Plato’s philosophy to take into account the literary aspects of the dialogues and to ask how Plato’s literary art of writing could possibly support his philosophical message and, for instance, to consider what this relation means in the context of the debate about developementalism versus unitarianism in Plato’s philosophy. In the present paper , I argue that the performance of the characters plays an important role in this context. I discuss various passages in the Laws which analyse the weakness of the will and I compare what Plato says there with the performance of Alcibiades in the Symposium. I conclude that the passages in the Laws can be read as a kind of commentary on Alcibiades’ behavior and I consider what this relation means in the context of the debate about developementalism versus unitarianism in Plato’s philosophy
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 9.

Tytuł:: Katedra i jaskinia
Cathedral and Cave
Autorzy:: Gokieli, Marcin
Tematy:: Plato
Kafka
dialectics
self-knowledge
pragmatics
de se; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/63292645.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: The paper is an attempt to analyze Plato’s allegory of the Cave and Kafka’s parable Before the law in order to understand those texts in a way that emphasizes the relationship encompassing pragmatics and semantics of the cognition (with an emphasis on de se contexts). The suggested definition of Plato’s concept of dialectics should appeal to a special role of the ability to connect the content of a theory being learned with the subject’s position within the theory. According to the suggested reading of Kafka’s work, the key problem of both Joseph K. and the protagonist of Before the law parable is the understanding of one’s own situation and assumptions about oneself. In both cases the occasional and de se aspect of knowledge turns out to be the key aspects.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 10.

Tytuł:: In Defense of Knowing, In Defense of Doubting: Cicero Engages Totalizing Skepticism, Sensate Materialism, and Pragmatist Realism in "Academica"
Autorzy:: Prus, Robert
Tematy:: Knowledge
Skepticism
Pragmatism
Realism
Relativism
Symbolic interactionism
Postmodernism
Cicero
Plato’s Academy; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138833.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Whereas contemporary scholars in the social sciences and humanities often envision themselves as exceptionally, if not uniquely, attentive to the problematics of human knowing and acting, the competing philosophies of totalizing skepticism, sensate materialism, divine worldviews, and pragmatist realism have a much more enduring presence in Western social thought. Plato (c420-348BCE) introduces a broad array of philosophic standpoints (theological, idealist, skepticist, materialist, and pragmatist) in his texts and Aristotle (c384-322BCE) addresses human knowing and acting in more distinctively secular, pluralist terms. Still, more scholarly considerations of human knowing and acting would be comparatively neglected by Cicero’s time and even more so after his era. Although much overlooked by those in the human sciences, Cicero’s Academica re-engages a number of highly consequential issues pertaining to the matter of human knowing and acting. Likewise, whereas Christian theologians often were hostile to heathen (relativist, materialist, pragmatist) philosophic viewpoints, important residues of these approaches would remain part of the Western intellectual tradition though Augustine’s (c354- 430 BCE) works. Academica is centered on the historically sustained skepticist emphases of Plato’s Academy (c350-50CE) but Cicero’s text also attends to some competing viewpoints that developed along the way. In addition to (1) acknowledging some of the intellectual shifts in Plato’s Academy over three centuries, this statement also (2) provides a pragmatist critique of the totalizing skepticism of the Academicians, and (3) illustrates the ways in which Cicero, as a representative and defender of Academician skepticism, deals with critiques pertaining to the problem of human knowing and acting. Thus, whereas Cicero is best known as a rhetorician and his text is presented as an instance of rhetorical interchange, Cicero’s Academica also may be seen as “a defense of knowing” and “a defense of doubting,” two of the most central features of scholarship.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Plato, knowledge" wg kryterium: Temat