Temat: Post-structuralism - Prolib Integro

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Wstęp do estetyki Derridy i Lyotarda
Autorzy:: Słomski, Wojciech
Tematy:: Deconstruction
Postmodernism
Post-structuralism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2148218.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: There have been outlined serious discrepancies between philosophies of Derrida and Lyotard on the grounds of deliberations concerning art. Lyotard questions the notion of beauty, demanding a replacement of it with a notion of the sublime, thanks to which artistic creation could also get rid of its constraints. Lyotard argues that beauty is possible thanks to the mimesis of nature, but the mimesis requires observance of the rules. Rejecting the idea of beauty, as a supreme value in art, we reject the necessity of subordinating art to rules, or, in Lyotard’s words, we sacrifice it for the freedom of practical reason.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Systemy filozoficzne Derridy i Lyotarda
Autorzy:: Słomski, Wojciech
Tematy:: Postmodernism
Post-structuralism
Deconstruction; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2148222.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Jacques Derrida and Jean-François Lyotard are the creators of a philosophical and cultural movement called postmodernism (Lyotard has also contributed to the popularization of the term “postmodernism”), but it should be remembered that currently the term “postmodernism” refers to the entire spectrum of various ideas, the ideas and texts from various fields, therefore, it is impossible to identify the philosophy of Derrida or the philosophy of Lyotard with the movement in philosophy or, more importantly, the humanities and social sciences, which we now call postmodernism. From today’s perspective, both Derrida and Lyotard belong to a large group of authors whose work constitutes broadly understood postmodernism, but it would be unwarranted to claim that this movement stems directly from their achievements. These philosophers have begun a new way of practicing philosophy and proposed a new point of view, but they did not create concepts that would be widely accepted by philosophers who describe themselves as postmodernists. They also did not raise any disciples or successors who would attempt to develop the concepts outlined by them, although undoubtedly some of their concepts have had a significant impact on both the development of philosophy and the humanities, and social sciences. The concept of Derrida’s deconstruction proved to be the most influential (by that, however, it is necessary to understand the general method of reading texts, but not the collection of Derrida’s views, sometimes referred to as “deconstruction”), and Lyotard’s thesis concerning the end of Grand Narratives. The detailed theses on aesthetic, social, semantic and, finally, political issues are, as it seems, known primarily to philosophy experts.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: O dekonstrukcji
Autorzy:: Słomski, Wojciech
Tematy:: Deconstruction
Postmodernism
Post-structuralism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2148232.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: From general assumptions concerning the method of reading the text, a series of detailed implications, important both for philosophy and for social, and political reality are drawn by Derrida. One of the binary oppositions, which Derrida submits to deconstruction, is the opposition between literalism and a metaphor. Also, that opposition, according to the French thinker, after a closer examination turns out to be a myth. According to popular belief, the literal meaning of the expression takes precedence over all metaphorical use in the sense that it is the foundation upon which the metaphorical use is built. From this point of view, a metaphor is supposed to be at most an addition and an ornament, and if it is supposed to be used in philosophy, it is only in exceptional circumstances, and to facilitate the understanding of the content that the philosopher tries to explain in any way possible in a language devoid of metaphors. In accordance with the assumptions of deconstruction, Derrida reverses this order and the concept, traditionally considered subservient to its opposition, puts in the first place. First of all, he notices that a metaphor does not belong to the language of philosophy, but to the colloquial language. We could expect that in order to understand the meaning of a metaphor in a philosophical text, we should translate it into a natural language in which we will be able to discover its literal meaning. Derrida believes that the process of reaching that literality we can admittedly begin, i.e., for any philosophical metaphor we can indicate some other term that comes off as literal, however, the term, after a closer analysis, also turns out to be a metaphor for which we need to find another expression that comes off as literal, etc. The difference between a philosophical metaphor and a natural expression comes down to the superficial impression of literalness, while, as a matter of fact, the natural expressions turn out to be old, “worn-out”, as Derrida expresses, metaphors.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: Wstęp do filozofii Jean-François Lyotarda
Autorzy:: Słomski, Wojciech
Czarnecki, Paweł
Tematy:: Deconstruction
Postmodernism
Post-structuralism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2148217.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: There is no doubt that Lyotard’s the most famous achievement is his conception of metanarrative. This concept undermines the credibility of traditional philosophy along with its claim for conceptual clarity, thanks to which we would be able to speak about the world as it “really” appears. Lyotard has pointed out that since the Enlightenment we have lived in an illusion believing in future possibility of coming to fruition of the narrative of the dialectics of Spirit, the emancipation of reason, social progress, etc. While rejecting metanarratives and proposing a limitation to micro-narration instead, Lyotard has established the theoretical foundations of a pluralistic society, seeking solutions of its own problems not by consensus, but by permanent endless disputes. He has presented, in essence, a new image of society as a multiplicity of various subsystems and discourses, none of which can claim to be superior to others. Despite sometimes harsh criticism, there will be only a slight exaggeration in the statement that his concepts have influenced not only the philosophy of the last decades of the 20th century, but indirectly also social reality, since the concept of the pluralistic society is derived directly from the philosophy of modernism. Even if we find that complaints made against Lyotard to be legitimate, we cannot deny that society functioning as Lyotard has desired, would be the society free from the threat of the rebirth of totalitarianism.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Derrida i Lyotard. Obok siebie
Autorzy:: Słomski, Wojciech
Tematy:: Deconstruction
Postmodernism
Post-structuralism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2148221.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: The present reflections will be devoted to the philosophies of Jacques Derrida and Jean- François Lyotard. We will attempt here to identify differences and similarities both between these two thinkers, and among the philosophical movements which their deliberations have given rise to. In the beginning, it is obviously necessary to make some terminology standardization, because such terms as “deconstructionism,” “post-structuralism” or “postmodernism” are sometimes used in various meanings, and are often the matter at issue. As a consequence of ambiguity of all these concepts, is the fact that individual authors are included either in post-structuralism or postmodernism, even when they have dissented themselves from belonging precisely to those philosophical currents.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: Derrida. Dekonstrukcja i jej konsekwencje
Autorzy:: Słomski, Wojciech
Tematy:: Deconstruction
Postmodernism
Post-structuralism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2148223.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: The purpose of deconstruction is not an understanding of the content of the text in the ordinary sense of the word, but to get to the bottom of everything that the text does not speak about explicitly, and thanks to it, it can lay claim to the truth. While speaking of signs which are rooted in metaphysics, Derrida, in fact, means precisely that the accepted tacit assumption that the text tells us something about the world, and that our task while reading the text is to bring out all there is in it that is directly related to real objects. That assumption can be accepted, and it may determine the way of reading the text only while going through a series of rhetorical procedures including the use of hierarchical conceptual oppositions, often possessing the evaluative character, or ignoring certain contents. Remaining outside the discourse and viewing it as a historical product, deconstruction should determine what and why has been relegated in that discourse to the margins and doomed to oblivion. The deconstructed text turns out to be another myth, moreover, the internally contradictory myth because in its innermost layer, which has just been revealed by deconstruction, denying it what it is trying to express itself.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 7.

Tytuł:: Teksty Drugie Nr 2 (1990)
Poststrukturalistyczne wyzwanie. Próba "dekonstrukcji"
Autorzy:: Landwehr, Jürgen
Współwytwórcy:: Łukasiewicz, Małgorzata. Tł.
Wydawca:: IBL PAN
Powiązania:: 21. H. Lang, Die psychoanalytische Theorie Jacques Lacans, w: Die Psychologie des 20 Jahrhunderts, t. 10, 1980, s. 723.
16. M. Frank, Was ist Neostrukturalismus, Frankfurt a/M 1983.
11. J. Derrida, Limited Inc., suplement do "Glyph" 2 (1977).
24. J. R. Searle, Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida, "Glyph" 1977, s. 198—208.
23. P. Ricoeur, Die Interpretation. Ein Versuch über Freud, Frankfurt a/M 1969, s. 45.
25. J. von Westphalen, Hasso von Braunfels, "Frankfurter Rundschau" 9 I 1988r., s. 6.
17. H.-G. Gadamer, Text und Interpretation, w: Text und Interpretation, red. P. Forget, München 1984, s. 37.
1. Austreibung des Geistes aus den Geisteswissenschaften. Programm des Poststrukturalismus, red. F. A. Kittler, Paderborn 1988.
14. V. Descombes, Das Selbe und das Andere. 45 Jahre Philosophie in Frankreich 1933—1978, Frankfurt a/M 1981, s. 51.
6. J. Culler, Dekonstruktion. Derrida und die poststrukturalistische Literaturtheorie, Reinbek 1988, s. 292 i nast.
18. G. Hartman, Sawing the Text. Literature, Derrida, Philosophy, Baltimore 1981, s. 33.
13. J. Derrida, The Conflict of Faculties, w: Language of Knowledge and of Inquiry, red. H. Riffaterre, New York 1982.
9. J. Derrida, Grammatologie, Frankfurt a/M 1983, s. 99.
8. F. de Saussure, Grundfragen der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin 1967, s. 78.
19. J. Hörisch, Die Wut des Verstehens. Zur Kritik der Hermeneutik, Frankfurt a/M 1988.
10. J. Derrida, Guter Wille zur Macht I und II, w: Text und Interpretation, red. P. Forget, München 1984, s. 56—58 i 62—77.
Teksty Drugie
5. J. Brenkman, Narcissus in the Text, "Georgia Review" 30 (1976), s. 293—327.
7. P. de Man, Allegorien des Lesens, Frankfurt a/M, 1988, s. 111.
12. J. Derrida, Positionen, Graz/Wien 1986.
15. M. Foucault, Die Ordnung des Diskurses, Frankfurt a/M 1970, s. 11.
20. J. Lacan, Das Drängen des Buchstaben im Unbewussten oder die Vernunft seit Freud, w: idem, 1975, Schriften II, s. 15—55.
3. H. Blumenberg, "Nachahmung der Natur". Zur Vorgeschichte des schöpferischen Menschen, "Studium generale" 10 (1957), s. 266—283.
4. H. Blumenberg, Wirklichkeitsbegriff und Wirkungspotential des Myths, w: Terror und Spiel, red. M. Fuhrmann, München 1971, s. 11—66.
22. B. Magnus, The End of "The End of Philosophy", w: Hermeneutics and Deconstructions, red. H. J. Siwerman, Don Inde, New York, s. 2—10.
2. H. Blumenberg, Arbeit am Mythos, Frankfurt a/M, 1979, s. 33.
Opis:: 21 cm
Dostawca treści:: RCIN - Repozytorium Cyfrowe Instytutów Naukowych

Książka

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 8.

Tytuł:: Przed czym poetykę ratuje doświadczenie? Wstępne rozpoznania
What Can Experiance Save Potics From? Preliminary Investigations
Autorzy:: Krajewska, Joanna
Tematy:: poetics
post-structuralism
experience
poststrukturalizm
doświadczenie
poetyka; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1363751.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Autorka analizuje metody i reguły stawiania problemów i odnajdywania odpowiedzi w wybranych tekstach polskich literaturoznawców, którzy podejmują refleksję nad miejscem poetyki we współczesnym dyskursie literaturoznawczym i pokazuje, że wyjściem z poststrukturalistycznego impasu stać się może kategoria doświadczenia.
The author analyzes the methods and rules of posing problems and finding answers in selected texts of Polish literature scholars who have devoted some thought to the place of poetics in contemporary literature studies discourse, and demonstrates that the category of experience may provide a way out of the Post-Structuralist impasse.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 9.

Tytuł:: Lepka męskość: poststrukturalizm, fenomenologia i podmiotowość w krytycznych studiach nad męskością
Teksty Drugie Nr 2 (2015)
Autorzy:: Berggren, Kalle
Wydawca:: IBL PAN
Powiązania:: Teksty Drugie
Opis:: 21 cm
Pol. text, eng. summary
Tekst pol., streszcz. ang.
Dostawca treści:: RCIN - Repozytorium Cyfrowe Instytutów Naukowych

Książka

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 10.

Tytuł:: Kant’s foedus pacificum: Path to peace or prolegomena to neoliberalism and authoritarian corporatist globalization in contemporary liberal democratic states?
Kantowskie foedus pacificum: droga do pokoju czy prolegomena neoliberalizmu i autorytarnej korporacjonistycznej globalizacji we współczesnych liberalnych demokracjach?
Autorzy:: Garrett, Terence M.
Tematy:: perpetual peace
post-structuralism
spectacle
neoliberalism
authoritarianism; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1371464.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Immanuel Kant’s language and concept of foedus pacificum (league of peace) combined with his call for a spirit of trade promised a prescription for world peace—“seeking to end all wars forever.” Nation-state level cooperation between liberal democracies has borne out Kant’s analysis to some effect. A consequence of the twin pursuits of foedus pacificum and spirit of trade has ironically resulted in the exploitation of society. Today’s international corporations adversely affect public policies ostensibly designed to protect citizens through an anti-democratic market-based ideology within the State—as seen through the lenses of Foucauldian post-structural theory and Debord’s society of the spectacle. The author proposes that globalist-corporatist control of governing apparatuses is now exposed for its authoritarian tendencies. This action could result in the ultimate destruction of the representative democratic state with the onset of neoliberalism and authoritarianism.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "Post-structuralism" wg kryterium: Temat