Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "WWII," wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Stosunki Polski z Afryką Arabską po II wojnie światowej
Polish Relations with North African Arab Countries After the Second World War
Autorzy:
Knopek, Jacek
Tematy:
Arab Africa
International relations after WWII
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie. Instytut Nauk Politycznych
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/566908.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The main aim of the article is to present different spheres of the Polish relations with North African countries, from the end of the Second World War until the end of the 80's of the last century when political transition begun in Poland. The adopting hypothesis states that despite significant differences in natural conditions, political systems, structure of economies, natural resources, culture and religion, Polish relations with Arab African countries have been developing in an investigated period. The origin of these relations was outlined in the context of global and regional political situation. Polish government supported Arab national movements. Poland established official diplomatic and economic ties with Arabic African countries which have gained independence. Those ties have been expanded in the 60's, 70's and 80's of the 20th century. Besides close diplomatic relations the main field of cooperation concerned economy. Turnover in mutual trade increased steadily, Poland transferred technologies and sold licenses, Polish specialists built transport infrastructure, public buildings, hospitals, sea ports, power stations, refineries, cement factories, textile factories, meat factories, sugar factories and other factories and also whole town's quarters, maritime lines between Polish and North African sea ports were established. Polish specialists carried out agricultural services. Thousands of Polish high skilled personnel worked in Arab African countries as: civil and mechanical engineers, technicians, doctors, nurses, architectures, lecturers at universities, agricultural experts. There were a quite large scale science and cultural cooperation. Few thousands of students from North Africa were educated in Poland. The fundamental changes in global order and political transition in Poland after 1989 caused deep and permanent setback in Polish relations with Arab African countries, especially in economic relations.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
I Kozacka Dywizja Kawalerii w latach 1942-1945
1st Cossack Cavalry Division in period 1942-1945
Autorzy:
Rogala, Hubert
Opis:
Thesis presents fates of german 1st Cossack Cavalry Division in period from forming in 1942 to the end of World War II. In the thesis were presented basics of the forming, uniforms and armament and also the combat trail. Thesis as well shows the situation of soldiers in final period of WWII and fates of soldiers after the war.
Praca przedstawia losy niemieckiej 1 Kozackiej Dywizji Kawalerii w okresie od jej powstania w 1942 do końca II wojny światowej. W pracy przedstawiono początki formowania Dywizji, umundurowanie i uzbrojenie, a także szlak bojowy. Praca ukazuje także sytuację żołnierzy w końcowym okresie wojny i ich losy po wojnie.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Inne
Tytuł:
Canadian WWII Veterans Charter as foundation of modern Canadian welfare state
Autorzy:
Paluszkiewicz-Misiaczek, Magdalena
Opis:
Security and prosperity are regarded as the cornerstones of Canadian society, where the government plays a vital role in establishing the universal social security system, earning the country the designation of a welfare state. The current model has its origins in World War II, particularly with the introduction of a comprehensive program for veteran re-establishment—known as the Veterans Charter. The aim of this paper is to explore the solutions that formed the foundation of the Canadian WWII Veterans Charter and the subsequent impact they had on the development of the welfare state in Canada.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Organizacja Wojskowa Związek Jaszczurczy na Pomorzu. Nieznany dokument Gestapo – protokół przesłuchania Andrzeja Eljaszewicza – pracownika ekspozytury „Zachód” Oddziału II OW ZJ
Military Organisation Lizard Union in Pomerania – an unknown document of the gestapo – the investigation protocol of Andrzej Eljaszewicz – a worker of the „West” Branch of Department II of the Military Organisation Lizard Union
Autorzy:
Chrzanowski, Bogdan
Tematy:
WWII
The Polish Underground
the Military Organisation Lizard Union
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1193676.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The Military Organisation Lizard Union (OW ZJ) was one of the numerous Organisations constituting the Polish Underground. It was set up in October 1939 by activists of the pre-war National Radical Camp. In September 1942 the Lizard Union became part of the National Military Forces. In the years 1940–1941 the „West” [„Zachód” – „Z”] Branch of Department II of the Main Headquarters of the Lizard Union was established. The intelligence network of the Lizard Union covered the territory of the Reich, Gdansk Pomerania and Eastern Pomerania up to Königsberg; it also reached Greater Poland and Silesia. Fighting the Lizard Union, considered one of the most active underground organisations, was one of the priorities of the Gestapo. The first arrests among intelligence workers of the „West” Branch of the Lizard Union commenced in December 1941 and lasted throughout the whole of 1942 until May 1943. The „West” Branch in Gdynia was headed by Andrzej Eljaszewicz. The document presented here is an investigation protocol of A. Eljaszewicz by Radom’s Gestapo on 22 February 1944. Eljaszewicz was arrested on 3 January 1944 in Białobrzegi on his way to Radom. The protocol consists of 21 pages. The analysis of its content allows us to reconstruct the organisation of the structures of the Lizard Union, its connections with the Home Army [Armia Krajowa] and the extensive intelligence activity in Pomerania. It also allows us an insight into members of the Lizard Union. The protocol includes the pseudonym and real surname of the Chief Commander of the Union of the Military Struggle – Home Army – Gen. Stefan Rowecki alias „Grot”. A thorough analysis of the protocol will extend further research on the issue of the Military Organisation Lizard Union, its structure, activity and organisational connections. It shall constitute a valuable document for a future researcher.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Królowie mórz. Geneza i historia pancerników typu Iowa
The kings of the seas. The origin and history of battleships Iowa
Autorzy:
Torka-Lis, Piotr
Opis:
Iowa-class battleships are considered the finest vessels of its class. Its genesis goes back to the second half of the nineteenth century, when the first ship left the shipyard armored. Long development battleships come to an end during World War II. Iowa-class battleships served in every major conflict led by the United States in the second half of the twentieth century, among others, in the Korean War, Vietnam, or the first Gulf War.
Pancerniki typu Iowa uważane są za najdoskonalsze okręty swojej klasy. Ich geneza sięga drugiej połowy XIX w., kiedy to stocznie opuścił pierwszy okręt pancerny. Długi rozwój pancerników znalazł swój koniec w okresie II wojny światowej. Okręty liniowe typu Iowa służyły w każdym większym konflikcie prowadzonym przez Stany Zjednoczone w drugiej połowie XX w., miedzy innymi w wojnie koreańskiej, wietnamskiej, czy pierwszej wojnie w Zatoce Perskiej.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Inne
Tytuł:
Intergenerational Transgressions in Re-living War and the Uncertainty of Displacement: A Privilege or a Curse for the Third Generation
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Coates, Anna
Tematy:
trauma transmission
historical trauma
WWII
generations
healing
social pedagogy
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1968335.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Transgression is often seen as a negative term; to cross social or ethical boundaries. In this paper, it is defined as ‘blurring of the symbolic boundaries between grandparents and younger generations in terms of the WWII experience’, which leads to living memory of the war, but also to experiencing and re-living the trauma of war and dislocation. It occurs through the immersion of younger generations in family history narratives, memorabilia, diaries and photographs that become a family treasure, owned jointly by the family members. In this paper, intergenerational transgression is analysed as a softand symbolic phenomenon, which on one hand preserves the memory of past, but on the other, cascades the negative experiences onto children and grandchildren. If this is true for WWII survivors, then it should be considered in other cases of long-term conflict and dislocation, particularly in recent conflicts such as Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Understanding the connection between intergenerational transgression of war trauma may aid the process of healing.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kontakty Aleksandry Kołłontaj z rodziną Wallenbergów (1930–1945)
Contact between Alexandra Kollontai and the Wallenberg Family (1930–1945)
Autorzy:
Ratuszniak, Jan
Tematy:
WWII
Sweden
the USSR
Finland
Raoul Wallenberg
the Winter War
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1194262.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The article presents the history of the contact between Alexandra Kollontai and the Wallenberg family. The first meetings between the Russian diplomat and the influential family of Swedish bankers took place in the 1930s during the negotiations concerning the return of the Russian gold kept by the bank owned by the Wallenbergs. Prior to the outbreak of WWII this first female ambassador met members of the Wallenberg family in a sanatorium. Undoubtedly, the encounters of Marcus Wallenberg with Alexandra Kollontai affected the situation of Finland during WWII. Without their common involvement in the case, the history of Finland during the war with the USSR might have been totally different. The backstage information about the relationship between Alexandra and Raoul Wallenberg is also very interesting. Unfortunately, we are unable to answer many questions and clarify doubts as long as the majority of the Russian archives devoted to the secretary of the Swedish diplomat remain secret.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza NRF w XXI wieku – Próba opisu
The compensation responsibility of the Federal Republic of Germany in the 21st century - An attempt to describe
Autorzy:
Gruszczyński, Krzysztof Jerzy
Tematy:
War reparation,
Germany,
WWII,
Poland damages,
Law and Justice Party
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/485749.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Poland’s Law and Justice Party (PiS) is considering whether to seek further reparations from German Federal Republic for the massive losses inflicted during WWII. PiS head Kaczynski described the move as a “historical counteroffensive.” World War II (WW II), which began with the German invasion of Poland in 1939, killed nearly 6 million Polish citizens and inflicted huge material losses, including the destruction of cultural treasures, industry and entire cities. Those crimes carry not only a moral price, but a material one as well: In 2004, Warsaw’s then-mayor, Lech Kaczynski, calculated that the Deutsche Bundesrepublik was liable for reparation payments of some $45 billion dollars (38 billion dollars) for the destruction of Warsaw alone. If one were to extrapolate the amount to include the whole of Poland, one would certainly arrive at a figure 10 to 20 times higher. That would be a sum that could only be paid out over decades and across generations. When one considers that German Federal Republic’s (GFR) final reparation payments to France and Belgium for the First World War were not made until 2010, one gets an idea of the dimensions of such a demand. Shortly after the PiS regained power in 2916 its leader, Jarosław Kaczyński, announced that Poland and the GFR had outstanding accounts to settle from the WW II. He went on to say that the issue of war reparations between the neighboring countries had never been resolved. Frank-Walter Steinmeier, GFR’s foreign minister at the time, answered Kaczynski’s claims with a letter stating that Poland had no legal basis for demanding such damages. He reminded Kaczynski of Poland’s relinquishment of reparations in 1953. Poland’s government did indeed waive its right to war reparations from its western neighbor at the time – yet that neighbor was the German Democratic Republic (GDR). A few other interesting points. The GFR has paid billions of dollars over the years in compensation for III Reich crimes, primarily to polish survivors, and acknowledges the country’s responsibility for keeping alive the memory of III Reich atrocities. After WW II, both GFR and GDR were obliged to pay war reparations to the Allied governments, according to the Potsdam Conference. Other Axis nations were obliged to pay war reparations according to the Paris Peace Treaties, 1947 an early plan for a post-war GFR was the Morgenthau plan with terms that would have essentially transformed the GFR to an agrarian society... This position was completely changed by the London Agreement on German External Debts, so called the London Debt Agreement. As a consequence of aggression by the III Reich much of Poland was subjected to enormous destruction of its industry (62% of which was destroyed), its infrastructure (84%) and loss of civilian life (16.7% of its citizens during the war- 10% of them Jews). It is estimated that damages incurred by Poland during WWII total $640 billion in 2004 exchange values. As of 2012, the GFR had paid a total of $89 billion in compensation to victims of the war, in Poland and beyond, and GFR officials continue to meet regularly to revise and expand the guidelines for compensation. All in all, after WW II 17 % of Polish citizens perished, 62 % of industry & 84 % of infrastructure was destroyed. The capital Warsaw was raised to the ground as a result of Warsaw Uprising of 1944. Poland could not benefit from US Marshall Plan as other countries (incl. the GFR) as the Soviets decided for Poland to renounce it. The GFR paying WWI reparations to France in 2010 (92 years after WWI). Polish estimates of the damage the country suffered are in the hundreds of billions of dollars, with a government figure from 1945-47 putting material losses at $850 billion, not including human losses. In 2004, Kaczynski’s late twin brother Lech, as mayor of Warsaw, put the damages to the capital city alone at $45.3 billion. Poland is the biggest net beneficiary of the bloc’s 140 billion-euro ($164 billion) annual budget, having been granted more than 250 billion dollars since entry. The monstrosity of III Reich crimes, not only against Polish Jews but also others, including the 150,000 civilians butchered during the Warsaw Uprising in 1944, will forever remain a disgrace and an unforgettable injustice. It is all the more so given that hardly any of those Germans responsible for the deeds were ever brought to account. In 2004 a special commission estimated that damages incurred by the Polish capital alone during WW II amounted to more than $45 billion (38 billion dollars). The commission was convened by Lech Kaczynski, then Warsaw’s mayor. The topic has routinely strained German-Polish relations since the national-conservative party PiS returned to power in 2016. On 23 August 1953, the Communist People’s Republic of Poland under pressure from the Soviet Union announced it would unilaterally waive its right to war reparations from the German Democratic Republic on 1 January 1954, with the exception of reparations for III Reich oppression and atrocities. The GDR in turn had to accept the Oder-Neisse border, which gave around 1/4 of GDR’s historic territory to Poland and the USSR. Poland’s former communist government, agreed in 1953 to not to make any further claims on GDR. Poland’s former Communist government waived its right to German post-war compensation back in 1953, as part of its commitment to “contribute to solving the GDR question in the spirit of democracy and peace.” However, many argue that the agreement was unlawful since the government at the time was under pressure from the Soviet Union, and following the reunification of the GFR in the 1990s the matter has faced new scrutiny. As to the GFR the federal government has claimed that its duty to compensate Poland was denounced in the 1950s but insists that it continues to stand by its moral and financial duties to the victims of the war. The GFR hadn’t paid reparations to non-Jewish recipients for the damage inflicted in Poland. The agreement signed by Mr. Gierek and Mr. Schmidt in 1975 in Warsaw, stipulated that 1.3 billion DM will be paid to Poles who, during Nazi occupation, had paid into GFR’s social security system without receiving pension. After German reunification, Poland demanded reparations again, as a reaction to claims made by German refugee organizations demanding compensation for property and land repossessed by the new Polish state that they were forcibly deported from as a stipulation of the Potsdam Agreement and the mentioned Oder-Neisse border. In 1992, the Foundation for Polish-German Reconciliation was founded by the Polish and GFR governments, and as a result GFR paid Polish sufferers ca. 4.7 billion PLN. There is still an ongoing debate among international law experts if Poland still has the right to demand war reparations, with some arguing that the 1954 declaration wasn’t legal. According to a statement made by the German government in 2017, the reparations issue was resolved in 1953 as Poland declined receiving any payments from the GFR. However, it’s worth remembering that in 2004, the Polish government reaffirmed that decision when, in return, Chancellor Gerhard Schröder promised that the GFR’s government would not support demands for damages lodged by expellees against the Polish government. The decision came about dueto the fact that the GFR had relinquished former eastern territories to Poland as compensation for III Reich war crimes. Poland’s ruling officials are stepping up calls to demand compensation from the GFR for damages caused in WW II, potentially deepening a divide between the European Union’s largest eastern member and the bloc’s biggest economy. Between the collapse of communism in 1989 and 2004 when Poland joined the EU, subsequent governments declared the issue of war reparations from the GFR closed, based on a declaration of the 1953 communist administration in Warsaw and treaties from 1970 and 1990 with the GFR. Presently the Polish parliament’s research office is preparing an analysis of whether Poland can legally make the claim and will have it ready by Aug. 11, 2017 according to Deputy Arkadiusz Mularczyk, a lawmaker with the ruling Law and Justice party who requested the report. One of the reasons that the government is reopening the question may be to demonstrate it isn’t intimidated by the EU’s criticism for democratic backsliding. The bloc has opened an unprecedented probe into Poland over the rule-of-law that’s centered on a government push to strip the judiciary of its independence by giving politicians greater control over the courts. In response to the Poland’s new demand Ulrike Demmer, deputy spokeswoman for the GFR government, said that, while the GFR assumed political, moral and financial responsibility for the WW, the question of restitution was closed. The deputy spokeswoman added, that the GFR has made significant reparations for general war damage, including to Poland, and is still paying significant compensation for III Reich wrongdoing. Further it is stated that the federal government has paid billions over the years in compensation, namely to Polish survivors, for war crimes committed during WW II. The country has also acknowledged its responsibility for keeping alive the memory of atrocities committed by the III Reich. As far as German lawyers and scholars are concerned, the issue was resolved years ago and are not afraid of any possible lawsuit in the International Court of Justice. In 2004, Jochen Frowein, an expert on international law and the former director of the Max Planck Institute in Heidelberg, along with a Polish historian, came to the conclusion that no such demand by Poland had any chance of being upheld in a court of law – and that remains the case today. In his opinion the question has been “legally resolved and definitively settled.” He also points to the Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to the GFR, known also as the Two plus Four Agreement. The agreement, signed in 1990, paved the way for German reunification and also made clear that the GFR would not be responsible to pay any further reparations stemming from WW II. Frowein refutes Polish Defense Minister Senor Antoni Macierewicz’s claim that Poland’s 1953 waiver is invalid because communist Poland was not a sovereign state. “Poland’s 1953 renunciation of reparations claims against the GFR remains valid even today. The fact that the constitutional situation in Poland has changed and that it is no longer a communist state does nothing to change the validity of that declaration. Many other treaties that Poland signed at the time have also remained in effect.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Samobójstwa artystów i sposób ich prezentacji na łamach przedwojennej prasy
Suicides of artists and their portrayal in Polish press before WWII
Autorzy:
Teler, Marek
Tematy:
samobójstwo
artyści
przedwojenna prasa
suicide
artists
Polish press before WWII
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Kultury Języka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/36085571.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Artykuł przedstawia, w jaki sposób pisano o samobójstwach artystów na łamach prasy z lat 20. i 30. Autor analizuje historie samobójczych zgonów pięciu osób: aktorki teatralnej Alojzy Żółkowskiej, aktora i reżysera Józefa Poremby-Jaracza, aspirującej malarki Heleny Niemczewskiej (córki akwarelisty Juliana Fałata), amanta filmowego Zbigniewa Staniewicza i aktora teatralnego Sergiusza Niłusa (Jerzego Alana). Pokazuje na ich podstawie, że przedwojenni dziennikarze żywo interesowali się tym zagadnieniem, a zwłaszcza przyczynami, dla których dochodziło do tragedii. Szczegółowe opisy przebiegu zdarzeń niejednokrotnie zdradzały wiele szczegółów z życia prywatnego gwiazd, zwłaszcza tych dotyczących ich stanu zdrowia.
The article presents the ways Polish press of the 1920s and 1930s used to write about suicides of artists. The author analyses the stories of suicidal deaths of five people: theatre actress Alojza Żółkowska, actor and director Józef Poremba-Jaracz, an aspiring painter Helena Niemczewska (the daughter of the watercolourist Julian Fałat), film heartthrob Zbigniew Staniewicz, and theatre actor Sergiusz Niłus (Jerzy Alan). These instances demonstrate that pre-war journalists took a keen interest in the issue, especially the reasons behind the tragedies. Detailed descriptions of the course of events often revealed many details of the stars’ private lives, especially their health-related conditions.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies