Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "fundamental rights" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Konsekwencje prawne Protokołu nr 30 w sprawie stosowania Karty praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej do Polski i Zjednoczonego Królestwa
Legal consequences of Protocol (No 30) on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom
Autorzy:
Jaśkowski, Marek
Tematy:
Charter of Fundamental Rights
human rights (fundamental rights)
European Union
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11882686.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The article examines the legal consequences of Protocol (No 30) on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom. The author notes that the Charter does not merely confirm the fundamental rights previously recognized in EU law, but also introduces new ones. In the light of this statement it is proposed, that – according to article 1(1) of the Protocol – the Charter does not extend the ability of given courts to examine the compliance of laws and practices of Poland and the UK with the Charter, as far as it introduces these new rights. Article 1(2) of the Protocol excludes the possibility of litigation based on provisions of title IV of the Charter. Article 2 of the Protocol aims at preventing the EU from imposing changes of national laws and practices in certain areas. In the light of provisions of the Charter (particularly article 52(6)) it is however doubtful, whether article 2 constitutes any genuine modification of legal obligations. Finally, the author notes, that according to the predominant view it would be theoretically possible for the Court of Justice of the EU to diminish or even deprive the Protocol of actual practical consequences by making use of general principles of EU law. This however might be regarded as a circumvention of primary EU law and as such deserves negative opinion.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Uzupełnienie opinii o stanowisku rządu RP wobec projektu rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady ustanawiającego na lata 2014–2020 program „Prawa i obywatelstwo” [KOM(2011) 758 wersja ostateczna] oraz określenie relacji między tym dokumentem a Kartą praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej
Addendum to the opinion concerning the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2014 to 2020 the Rights and Citizenship Programme (COM (2011) 758 final) on legal relationship between a regulation and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (“Charter”)
Autorzy:
Łacny, Justyna
Sakowicz, Andrzej
Tematy:
fundamental rights
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16642542.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The opinion comments on the draft position of Poland concerning a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2014 to 2020 the Rights and Citizenship Programme (COM (2011) 758 final). It also clarifies the legal relationship between a regulation (Article 288 (2) Treaty on functioning of the European Union) and the Charter as explained in the latest case-law of the European Court of Justice.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gloss to the Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-524/15, Criminal Proceedings against Luca Menci
Autorzy:
Błachnio-Parzych, Anna
Tematy:
Ne bis in idem
balancing test
limitations of fundamental rights
fundamental rights
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1195203.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
This gloss discusses the position of the Court of Justice of the European Union taken in the judgment passed on 20 March 2018 in the case of Luca Menci (C-524/15) in reference to the restrictions of ne bis in idem principle. The main thesis of the Court concerned the admissibility of restrictions of ne bis in idem based on the principle of proportionality as a limitation clause and its accordance with the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The analysis of the right not to be tried or punished twice in Article 4 Protocol 7 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms allows us to formulate opposite conclusions. The application of the balancing test as a limitation clause for ne bis in idem, finds no support in the case-law of the ECtHR too. According to the Author, the position taken in Menci infringes Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, according to which the meaning and scope of the rights which correspond to rights guaranteed by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms shall be at least be the same.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Fundamental Rights and Latvian Constitution (1918–1934)
Autorzy:
Pleps, Janis
Tematy:
Latvia, constitution, fundamental rights
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621186.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The Latvian road towards inclusion of the fundamental rights catalogue in the constitution started with proclamation of the state on November 18, 1918. The initial transitional constitutions already included according to their laconic style rather extensive guarantees of the fundamental rights. Mostly that means guarantees for national minorities. In the inter-war period, the catalogue of the fundamental rights was not considered as a significant component of the constitution content. The norms of the catalogue were generally perceived as “declarative slogans”, which had little practical significance. Much greater importance was assigned by the politicians and jurists to the laws adopted by the parliament with regards to the procedure of implementing certain fundamental rights. Latvian Constitutional Assembly has included “The Basic regulations regarding rights and regulations of the citizens” as a second part of the Constitution. The German Weimar Constitution of August 11, 1919 was used as a pattern for the draft of this part of the Constitution. The draft of the second part of Constitution prescribed a range of civic and political individual rights and freedoms. Parallel to that, the draft of the second part of the Constitution contained articles, which prescribed the state responsibility to protect the nationally-cultural autonomy of minorities, monuments of art, history, and nature, as well as marriage as the foundation of the family. The second part of the Constitution also dealt with the some social matters. Unfortunately, the second part of the Constitution was not adopted, leaving the regulation of this matter for the upcoming generations, which was completed only ten years ago.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zasada godności ludzkiej w unijnym prawie pierwotnym i prawie pochodnym obejmującym przestrzeń wolności, bezpieczeństwa i sprawiedliwości
The principle of human dignity in the primary and AFSJ secondary legislation of the European Union
Autorzy:
Kołatek, Radosław
Tematy:
human dignity
fundamental rights
Charter of Fundamental Rights
individual
justice and home affairs (JHA)
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2211874.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
This article presents the normative status of the principle of human dignity in the law of the European Union. The issue is portrayed with reference to primary and secondary legislation of the EU. The first field of analysis was the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights as primary sources of EU law. The examination of secondary law in the form of regulations, directives as well as soft law used to implement the policies regarding the area of freedom, security and justice was the subsequent stage. Having explored this, it was possible to formulate the thesis of this paper. It is believed that human dignity – as a principle of EU law – is a legally binding rule not only for the Member States but also for the third countries applying for EU membership. Human dignity is also one of the indivisible and universal values on which the European Union is founded.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The European Union and Fundamental Rights/Human Rights: Vanguard or Villain?
Autorzy:
Rosas, Allan
Tematy:
Europan Union Law
human rights/fundamental rights
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/684989.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The protection of fundamental rights and human rights in the European Union has witnessed several phases and fluctuations. In the early days of European integration, whilst it would be exaggerated to brand the then Communities a ‘villain,’ there was no explicit recognition of fundamental rights/human rights as being part of Community law. I hope it should have become clear by now that the Union does not fit particularly well into any of these two extremes. But by comparison to the other EU institutions, the Court of Justice has been somewhat of a forerunner, taking the first steps towards a fundamental rights system already in 1969 and contributing in many respects to its further development.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Koniec polityki? Globalizacja versus bezpieczeństwo, reputacja i prawa podstawowe
Autorzy:
Zariczny, Piotr
Tematy:
Postpolitics
Globalisation
Security
Reputation
Fundamental Rights
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2007383.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The problem of politics is that nobody controls it anymore, because the social formula of its acceptance is expiring, or has already expired. There is anarchy. There exist monopolies of international corporations, which try to govern globally but do not have sufficient social legitimation to do it. The notion of economic globalisation that refers to this has been developed, but in reality there is a vacuum of global management and participation (the growth of emotions over reasons, a tribal approach, and territorialism) in the prospect of growing threats (e.g. climate change, terrorism, migrations, pandemics). An average human, full of natural envy, desires that everybody can fulfil themselves in the material world the same as them, and such equality would be satisfying for them as we know that the argument about similar stomachs is universal. He or she does not want equality in spiritual realisation; here, with ease, he or she accepts that there are smarter and more talented people than them, but they will defend fiercely their equality, treating their right to it extremely seriously. Equality is a part of human faith, and practice confirms the suggestions that traditional mythical patterns cannot be eliminated without toil. Certainly, there is no threat of the end of politics. So far, all living organisms of the human kind organise themselves. The specifics of this self-organisation depend on self-determination. People will have an interest in politics as long as politics determines their security. Nowadays, we are again witnesses to disorder, revolution, desperation, and terror, so the factors that cause fear start to dominate in the moral narrative. Finally, security and directing improvement of life chances are tasks of politics and the political character. It would be a catastrophe if a problem of security returned to its pre-political state. The basic aspect of human self-determination is the organisation of every personal life according to the norms and activities allowed by the group. Theories referring to the crisis of democracy (through e.g. the dictates of fear of nuclear war, terrorism, ecologic catastrophe, a technocratic state with an expert-driven system, entertainment justified by economic-political interest groups, and losing sovereignty through complicated institutions, external networks, and sub-political social subgroups) could become true, or have already become true. The loss of reputation, credibility, and attractiveness can happen at the same time as the decline of the meaning of internalisation in social communication, which appears in the growing discouragement towards politics and the creation of subsystems that are not predictable and steerable in a democratic way because of their complexity.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Karta Praw Podstawowych Unii Europejskiej - geneza, stosowanie, debata polityczna
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - genesis, application, political debate
Autorzy:
Kiecka, Dominika
Opis:
The object of the study is the analysis of issues related to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which was adopted at a conference held in Nice, 7 December 2000 and is a set of fundamental rights of the individual. In the first chapter approximate the concept of fundamental rights, first used by the European Court of Justice in 1969. In addition, the characteristic of the Charter was presented with regard to British protocol, to which Poland has acceded. Further work shows the ongoing political debate in Poland about the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the surrounding ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon, as well as the evolution of the position of Polish Bishops to the Charter. The analysis was also applied to the Charter of Fundamental Rights on the basis of reports from the application of the Charter. Efforts have also been undertaken to assess the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Przedmiotem pracy jest analiza zagadnień związanych z Kartą Praw Podstawowych, którą przyjęto podczas konferencji odbywającej się w Nicei, 7 grudnia 2000 roku i która stanowi zbiór praw podstawowych przysługujących jednostce. W pierwszym rozdziale przybliżone zostało pojęcie praw podstawowych, użyte po raz pierwszy w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości w 1969 roku. Ponadto przedstawiona została charakterystyka Karty wraz z uwzględnieniem protokołu brytyjskiego, do którego przystąpiła Polska. W dalszej części praca ukazuje debatę polityczną toczącą się w Polsce wokół Karty Praw Podstawowych oraz wokół ratyfikacji Traktatu z Lizbony, a także ewolucję stanowiska Episkopatu Polskiego wobec Karty. Analizie poddane zostało również stosowanie Karty Praw Podstawowych w oparciu o Sprawozdania ze stosowania Karty. Podjęto także próbę oceny Karty Praw Podstawowych.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Inne
Tytuł:
Ochrona praw człowieka w dzisiejszej Europie
Protecting human rights in today’s Europe
Autorzy:
O’Flaherty, Michael
Tematy:
fundamental rights
human rights
Agency for Fundamental Rights
the European Union
discrimination
prawa podstawowe
prawa człowieka
Agencja Praw Podstawowych
Unia Europejska
dyskryminacja
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/694074.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Today, the foundations of the European system of the protection of human rights are increasingly frequently and more boldly challenged. Despite the continued efforts of the European Union in this respect, hate speech continues to be directed at various groups. Likewise, the freedom of speech which underlies the European democracy is being threatened by a trend observed in the law making, where under the pretext of ensuring the security of the citizens, preventive measures are taken to stop the media from fulfilling their social function. The rhetoric of many politicians places national security in opposition to the rights and freedoms of an individual. And yet, these two values do not exclude each other. On the contrary, they are complementary to each if onlya state is built on the rule of law, the education of a civil society is ensured and the errors of the historical past are not repeated.
Fundamenty europejskiego systemu ochrony praw człowieka są dzisiaj coraz częściej i coraz odważniej kwestionowane. Mowa nienawiści, wymierzona w różne grupy, przybiera na sile pomimo wysiłków, jakie przez lata Unia Europejska czyniła w tym zakresie. Swobodzie wypowiedzi, będącej przecież podstawą europejskiej demokracji, zagraża tendencja stanowienia prawa, które pod pretekstem zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa obywatelom de facto powstrzymuje media przed wykonywaniem ich społecznej misji. Wreszcie, w retoryce wielu polityków bezpieczeństwo narodowe jest stawiane w opozycji do praw i wolności jednostki, podczas gdy te dwie wartości wcale się nie wykluczają. Wręcz przeciwnie – uzupełniają się wzajemnie, o ile stanowimy prawo w oparciu o zasadę prawodządności, dbamy o edukację społeczeństwa obywatelskiego i nie powtarzamy błędów historii.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies