Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "impartiality" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Bezstronność światopoglądowa państwa - fakt czy postulat
The Worldview Impartiality of the State - Fact or Postulate
Autorzy:
Smoła, Mateusz
Opis:
The main goal of this thesis is to discuss the most vital issues and problems related to the worldview impartiality, formulated in Article 25, Paragraph 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Moreover, it presents the origins both of the principle of impartiality itself and the phenomena on which it is based. The author considers the historical, political and philosophical aspects of the problem.The first chapter presents the subject of the separation of Church and state, which is the basis of the worldview impartiality principle. The author traces the development of the sociological, political and cultural mechanisms which led to the idea of separation and discusses the modern models of the idea. He also writes about the catholic Church standpoint on relations between the Church and state, as stated by pope John XXIII and the Second Vatican Council.The second chapter discusses the sociopolitical factors which influenced the creation of norms regarding the relation between the Church and state, as stated in the current Constitution of the Republic of Poland. It also presents the model of those relations, enforced by the Constitution.The third chapter is concerned with the worldview impartiality principle itself. It presents the origins of the moral neutrality in general, its philosophical basis and terminological issues linked with the impartiality principle as stated in Article 25, Paragraph 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. As for the terminological choices, the author discusses in detail their normative consequences, as well as the correlation between the impartiality and neutrality. The author describes the criticism of the impartiality principle, basing on the examples of social phenomena, e.g. the availability of abortion. Finally, the author summarizes the reflections and presents the conclusions.
Celem pracy jest punktowe ukazanie, sygnalizacja najważniejszych zagadnień i problemów związanych z problematyką bezstronności światopoglądowej, sformułowanej w art. 25 ust 2. Konstytucji RP, a także prześledzenie genezy samej zasady, jak również genezy zjawisk leżących u jej podstaw, w ujęciu historyczno-politycznym, a także filozoficznym.Pierwszy rozdział pracy dotyczy kwestii rozdziału państwa od Kościoła, w której zakorzeniona i z którą związana jest zasada bezstronności światopoglądowej. Prześledzono w nim rozwój zjawisk, mechanizmów społecznych, politycznych i kulturowych, i rozmaite zaszłości, które doprowadziły do narodzin idei rozdziału oraz jej realizacji, a także przedstawiono współczesne modele rozdziału oraz nauczanie Kościoła katolickiego na temat relacji państwa i Kościoła, wypowiedziane przez papieża Jana XXIII oraz Sobór Watykański II.W drugim rozdziale zarysowano okoliczności społeczno-polityczne towarzyszące pracom legislacyjnym nad normami dotyczącymi stosunków między państwem a Kościołem w obowiązującej Konstytucji oraz przedstawiono ich rezultat, a także ukazano model relacji państwo-Kościół przyjęty w Konstytucji RP.Trzeci rozdział poświęcony jest stricte zasadzie bezstronności światopoglądowej. Przedstawia genezę reguły neutralności moralnej w ogóle i jej podstawy filozoficzne, kwestie terminologiczne formuły bezstronności zawartej art. 25 ust. 2 ustawy zasadniczej oraz ich konsekwencje normatywne, relacje między bezstronnością a neutralnością i wreszcie krytykę zasady bezstronności w odniesieniu do doniosłych, przykładowych zjawisk społecznych, jak np. dopuszczalność przerywania ciąży. Zawiera także podsumowania oraz wnioski szczegółowe płynące z rozważań.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Inne
Tytuł:
Ethical threats and safeguards. The case of statutory auditors in the Gdansk region
Autorzy:
Kotyla, Cyryl
Hyży, Maciej
Tematy:
auditors’ ethics
safeguards
public interest
independence
impartiality
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Księgowych w Polsce
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1917400.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify ethical threats faced by Polish statutory auditors in their professional work and the methods of counteracting these threats, i.e., safeguards ensuring compliance with ethical principles of statutory auditors. Methodology/Approach: Survey research was conducted among 45 statutory auditors from the Regional Branch of the Polish Chamber of Statutory Auditors in Gdansk with the aim of identifying the types of ethical threats and safeguards in the practice of Polish statutory auditors. Findings: Based on the research, it was found that among all types of ethical threats indicated in the survey, statutory auditors indicated the risk of familiarity as the type with which they most often deal. The risk of intimidation was ranked second on the list of threats. When it comes to safeguards used by the audited auditors, they primarily indicated two types, i.e., principles and procedures that enable the identification of interest and business relationship between the firm, the personnel and the client, as well as rotating senior assurance team personnel. Originality/Value: Our study fills the gap in the Polish literature in the field of research on the types of ethical threats in the work of statutory auditors and the safeguards they use. We have audited the occurrence of individual types of ethical threats and assessed which of them appear most often in the practice of statutory auditors, threatening the ethical attitudes of statutory auditors. Our study also enriches the literature by presenting the types of security used by Polish statutory auditors to comply with ethical principles
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Disqualification of en employee of a public administration authority in the European Union Member States
Autorzy:
Kmiecik, Zbigniew
Tematy:
administrative proceedings
impartiality
bias
close persons
consanguinity
affinity
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/28861135.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
One of the rules contained in the Code of Good Administrative Behavior adopted in 2001 by the European Parliament is the principle of impartiality and independence (Article 8). The presence of this rule, despite its non-binding nature, prompted the author to examine – using the method of comparative law analysis – whether the EU Member States have regulated this issue in their legal systems – and if so, to what extent and how. The basic institution serving the implementation of this principle is the disqualification of an employee of the authority from participation in the proceedings in situations where their impartiality seems to be at risk. Not all EU countries explicitly provide for such an institution. Among the legal systems that contain it, only some regulate the entirety of issues related to it: the grounds for disqualification, the procedure for disqualification and the consequences of it, as well as the appealability of orders taken in this matter and the consequences of violating the provisions on disqualification. Regulations of individual issues differ in the degree of detail. This applies primarily to the reasons for the disqualification of an employee of the authority. The most important reason for the disqualification of employees (except when they or their spouse are a party to the proceedings) is the consanguinity or affinity between them and the party. However, the ranges of such ties resulting in automatic disqualification of an employee, adopted in EU member states, differ significantly. The second area of significant difference is the consequences of the potentially biased employee’s participation in the proceedings. The solutions adopted in this regard in legislation and jurisprudence depend on how the main purpose of the provisions concerning the disqualification of an employee is perceived: as strengthening the public’s trust in the executive, or as a fair settlement of the matter.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Seven Initial Prominent Sources of All Information Bias Impartiality Types Parsed
Autorzy:
Bean, Erik
Tematy:
Impartiality
Information Bias
Inspected
Media
Parsed
Sources
Types
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Univerzita sv. Cyrila a Metoda. Fakulta masmediálnej komunikácie
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/52494951.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Ever since information was first operationalized by library science into consumer formats, media bias has been studied from the purview of information gatekeepers who decide what, how, and when to publish based on story importance and factors like circulation. This concept did not include individuals or entities outside of the journalism discipline. With the advent of the internet and a number of social media networks that soon followed, individuals could more effectively release information without waiting for gatekeepers, thus shaping the public’s perception regardless of the topic. Scholars offered a theoretical framework for shaping the public’s opinion and still other scholars focused on how information could be slanted or partisan. However, these seminal approaches did not operationalize the term information bias in terms of the overall partiality of major sources themselves. Information evaluation tests such as the Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) and Stop, Investigate, Find, Trace (SIFT) that have been discussed as tools to assess information for bias fall short on the very first step of what to inspect and how to sort. With a gap in the literature sorting through the types of biases can be daunting and confusing. The purpose of this paper is to propose one initial method as the first step to sort information bias regardless of its form, analog or digital, into seven prominent sources each with their own inherent but larger impartiality tied to it. The sources of all information bias to be discussed in alphabetical order are: 1) academic, 2) forprofit, 3) government, 4) hidden agenda, 5) individuals, 6) nonprofit, and 7) watchdog groups.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Niezawisłość, niezależność i bezstronność w sądownictwie w świetle regulacji prawnych oraz orzecznictwa
Concepts of independence and impartiality of the judiciary in the light of regulations and case-law
Autorzy:
Olszak, Krzysztof
Tematy:
niezawisłość
niezależność
bezstronność
sądy
sędziowie
independence
impartiality
courts
judges
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Fundacja im. Aliny i Leszka Allerhandów
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/498863.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
W artykule podjęto próbę analizy pojęć niezawisłości sędziów, niezależności sądów oraz bezstronności sądu. Przedstawiono uregulowania prawne oraz wykładnię sądów i trybunałów na poziomie krajowym i europejskim posiłkując się przy tym poglądami doktryny. Celem opracowania jest zaproponowanie uporządkowania narracji w przedmiocie rozumienia wskazanych terminów – na podstawie dotychczasowej judykatury. Terminy „niezawisłość”, „niezależność” i „bezstronność” są nie tylko doniosłe teoretycznie i praktycznie, ale obecnie żywo dyskutowane i nic nie wskazuje na to, aby w najbliższym czasie uległo to zmianie. Rozważenie znaczenia terminów i zaproponowanie ich rozgraniczenia niesie za sobą konsekwencje dla funkcjonowania całego systemu prawa.
The article deals with an issue of understanding of the concepts indicated in the title which are subject of interpretation of courts and tribunals at a national and European level. The aim of the analysis is to find out how the above phrases are understood and to propose a way to organize them. The proper meaning of the terms: “independence”, and “impartiality” is not only theoretically and practically significant, but is also currently under discussion. The consideration of these terms is therefore of fundamental importance for the functioning of the entire legal system.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Bezstronność światopoglądowa a obecność symboli religijnych w instytucjach publicznych
Worldview Impartiality and the Presence of Religious Symbols in Public Institutions
Autorzy:
Szewczyk, Roman
Tematy:
impartiality of public authorities
religious symbols
neutrality
public authority
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne Adalbertinum
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/30146557.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 1997 formulated the principle of religious, ideological and philosophical impartiality of public authorities, which, apart from the principle of equal rights for churches and other religious associations, determines the Polish model of state-church relations. Impartiality in matters of religious, ideological and philosophical beliefs concerns public authorities, not the state as the political structure of the nation. Public authorities in the Republic of Poland, both individual and collective, are created by persons with specific religious, ideological and philosophical beliefs. Therefore, taking into account the respect for the freedom of conscience and religion of persons performing the functions of authorities, as well as the principle of impartiality of public authorities, the formula of open neutrality should be preserved in a democratic state of law, according to which public authorities are obliged to equal treatment of all people, regardless of their beliefs, on the other hand, they refrain from accepting the principles of one religion, worldview or philosophy, also those of an atheistic or agnostic nature. It should be emphasized that, contrary to the demands of various groups to remove the cross from public space, its presence is not a contradiction or a violation of the constitutional principle of impartiality of public authorities in matters of religious beliefs.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rozumienie zasady neutralności światopoglądowej państwa
Understanding of the legal neutrality of state towards worldview principle
Autorzy:
Szymula, Alan
Opis:
Given Master Thesis raises the question of legal neutrality of state towards worldview principle. It covers principle's sources, views of doctrine and attempts to define it. In futher part, jurisdiction and constitutional provisions of selevted countries are being analyzed. Polish Constitution, jurisdiction of Polish Constitutional Court and implementation of metioned principle is analyzed as well. Furthermore, Thesis shows the differences between legal neutrality of state towards worldview principle and legal impartiality of state towards worldview, which was implemented in Polish constitutional provisions.
Praca porusza zagadnienie neutralności światopoglądowej państwa. Omawia jej źródła, poglądy doktryny oraz podejmuje próbę jej zdefiniowania. W dalszej części poddane analizie jest orzecznictwo oraz przepisy konstytucyjne wybranych krajów. Analizowana jest także polska Konstytucja, orzecznictwo Trybunału Konstytucyjnego oraz realizowanie omawianej zasady w praktyce. Praca przedstawia ponadto różnice pomiędzy zasadą neutralności światopoglądowej państwa a zasadą bezstronności, która została zaimplementowana w polskich przepisach konstytucyjnych.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Inne
Tytuł:
Bezstronność i neutralność światopoglądowa sędziego
Judicial impartiality and neutrality
Autorzy:
Ciszewski, Wojciech
Opis:
The article has two basic goals. The first one is to create a conceptual framework for the discussion of judicial impartiality. In order to achieve this aim, in this text I reflect on three aspects of the principle of impartiality, which have generally been studied independently from one another in the literature. I make an attempt to show that the three distinguished aspects of impartiality can be analysed, using a uniform conceptual scale. The second goal of the paper is to justify a claim that one of these aspects (namely the aspect of impartiality towards worldview doctrines) differs from the other two in terms of structure. In the text, I attempt to consider that difference and then propose a formula for judicial worldview neutrality that takes into account the special nature of that aspect of judicial impartiality. The conclusion of these reflections is the introduction of two versions of the worldview neutrality principle, which should – in my view – be applied in activities under taken by judges.
Dostawca treści:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Artykuł
Tytuł:
POZYCJA PRAWNA SPIKERA IZBY GMIN
THE LEGAL POSITION OF THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS
Autorzy:
Pastuszko, Grzegorz
Tematy:
speaker
House of Commons
legal status
impartiality
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/512994.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
The subject matter of this article is the institution of the Speaker in the British parliamentary system. All the remarks, set out in the article, focus on four major themes: 1) genesis of the office, 2) mechanism for election and the duration of the term of office, 3) impartiality and, 4) scope of the powers produced by legislation or created in parliamentary practice. As can be seen then, the concept of the article enables the contemporary institution of the Speaker to be portrayed including the historical background. It also enables the author to prove his main thesis, indicating that all the changes concerning this institution, which have been made over last couple of years, resulted neither in enhancing nor in weakening the parliamentary role of the Speaker as a neutral arbitrator between political parties in the UK parliament.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Emotional Labour of Judges
Praca emocjonalna sędziów
Autorzy:
Wojciechowski, Maciej
Dowgiałło, Bogna
Rancew-Sikora, Dorota
Tematy:
Arlie Hochschild
legal culture
judicial impartiality
kultura prawna
niezależność sędziowska
Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej – Sekcja Polska IVR
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/927303.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:
Our article concentrates on emotions as related to the functioning of man in the judicial system seen as a modern bureaucratic institution. Special attention is given to the work of judges due to their key position in this system. In legal discourse there is a dominating normative idea of a judge as a decision-making subject free of any emotional factors influencing their judgment. According to this traditional approach, a decision biased even in the slightest way by emotions could not be regarded as impartial, whereas judicial impartiality is regarded as one of the core values of the justice system. Our standpoint assumes not only that judges experience emotions but also asserts that they are being manifested in varied ways. Our analysis is based on Arlie Hochschild’s conception of emotional labour. Such labour is being performed when an individual reflects on his or her feelings and makes an effort either to change or to inhibit emotions which are regarded as misfitting. The necessity of emotional work is a result of cultural feeling and expression rules. It seems prima facie that there is one clear expression rule regarding displaying emotions by the judge in the Polish legal culture: no emotions allowed. However, contrary to possible reconstructed declarations and recommendations warning judges against showing emotions, the rules of expressing them in Polish courts are not unequivocal. We claim that one can distinguish between unconditional and conditional rules of expressing emotions. The former relate to expressing emotions concerning non-professional participants, and conditional rules of expressing emotions relate to professional participants in the hearing. There are situations in which an emotional reaction is reasonable, because it represents certain values to which the justice department adheres, and those in which judges regret showing annoyance or anger. The goal of the emotional labour performed is not only a realization of the value of impartiality, but also the balance of the judges that allows them to efficiently fulfil their role.
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies