Temat: sea borders - Prolib Integro

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Development of a risk assessment methodological framework for seaborders
Autorzy:: Gkrizis, V.
Leventakis, G.
Nikitakos, N.
Sfetsos, A.
Tematy:: sea borders
risk assessment; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Morski w Gdyni. Polskie Towarzystwo Bezpieczeństwa i Niezawodności
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2069512.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Sea borders are identified as a major entry point in EU. In order to be adequately prepared to manage illegal immigrant’s inflow and mitigate the significant socioeconomic impact. The present paper introduces a comprehensive risk analysis methodological framework for the analysis of the present situation, risk prioritization and mitigation analysis. The proposed approach will be applied to a specific site in a N. Aegean Island, Greece as the country is the access point of over 80% of all immigration flow to the EU.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Dzieje Najnowsze : [kwartalnik poświęcony historii XX wieku] R. 10 z. 2 (1978)
Dostęp do morza w politycznej i gospodarczej myśli oraz praktyce ostatnich dziesięcioleci przed odzyskaniem niepodległości (ok. 1870-1918)
Autorzy:: Dopierała, Bogdan (1922–1991)
Współwytwórcy:: Instytut Historii Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Wydawca:: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Powiązania:: Dzieje Najnowsze : [kwartalnik poświęcony historii XX wieku]
Opis:: p. 13-37
s. 13-37
Streszcz. ros., ang.
Summary in Russian and English.
Dostawca treści:: RCIN - Repozytorium Cyfrowe Instytutów Naukowych

Książka

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 3.

Tytuł:: The EU’s notion of territoriality: the “Westphalian Memory” vs. the “New Empire”. Consequences for the macro-regional dimension of the Adriatic Sea Region
Autorzy:: Vitale, Alessandro
Tematy:: Europe
EU
Adriatic Sea
borders
territoriality
modern state
security; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Wyższa Szkoła Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego i Indywidualnego Apeiron w Krakowie
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1878692.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: The creation of the European Union in 1992 reflected an attempt to rethink some of basic modern political concepts as national sovereignty and citizenship. But in recent years the European spatial development policy discourse has taken an evident territorial character with the enforcement of the idea of territorial cohesion and territorial continuity. The spatial predominant EU’s conception contributes to an evident emergence of a modern territorial building of the European space. Moreover, nowadays the instrument of hard and closed border and the sharp inside/outside dichotomy are accepted as the normality in Europe. Due to this notion of territoriality, the idea of the EU as a “non-Westphalian new empire” (according to the “neo-medieval paradigm”) is at least unrealistic. Its borders are getting more territorial, physical and visible, in deep contrast with an imperial historical structure. Hard border policies and practices on the borders mirror the existence of a de facto barrier and of a deep “Westphalian memory” in the way to use the territory as support of political unity. The EU’s drive to re-territorialise Europe is not a mere academic question; it has real consequences for people and places. Supra-nationalism reveals itself as a metaphor of “re-territorialization”, a paradox with strong political and economic consequences. In the macro-regional dimension of the Adriatic Sea region the EU’s “re-territorialisation” can impede seriously the cooperation across the EU’s external borders.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 4.

Tytuł:: The boundaries of marine and submarine areas of the Republic of Croatia
Granice morskich i podmorskich obszarów Republiki Chorwackiej
Autorzy:: Demel, Bartłomiej
Współwytwórcy:: Lankosz, Kazimierz
Dostawca treści:: Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

Książka

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 5.

Tytuł:: Mobility and regionalisation: Changing patterns of air traffic in the Baltic Sea Region in connection to European integration
Geographia Polonica Vol. 91 No. 1 (2018)
Autorzy:: Nilsson, Jan Henrik. Autor
Wydawca:: IGiPZ PAN
Powiązania:: 1. Agnew J., 2008. Borders on the mind: Re-framing border thinking. Ethics and Global Politics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v1i4.1892
42. KOMORNICKI T., 2010. Flows of persons and goods across the Polish segment of the outer boundary of the European Union – results of a research project [in:] T. Komornicki (ed.), European Union: External and internal borders, interactions and networks. Warszawa: Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS.
67. Parker N., Vaughan-Williams N., 2012. Critical border studies: Broadening and deepening the 'lines in the sand' agenda. Geopolitics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 727-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.706111
25. EUROSTAT, 2014. Real GDP Growth Rates, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu [18 March 2014].
31. Hazans M., Philips K., 2010. The post-enlargement migration experience in the Baltic labor markets [in:] M. Kahanec, K.F. Zimmermann (eds.), EU labor markets after post-enlargement migration, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 255-304.
39. KANT E., 1935. Estland och Baltoskandia. Tartu: Särtryck ur Svio-Estonica.
50. Lösch A., 1954. The economics of location. New Haven: Yale University Press.
19. Deutsch K., 1953. Nationalism and social communication: An inquiry into the foundations of nationality. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
61. Nove A., 1992. An economic history of the USSR 1917-1991. Third edition. London: Penguin books.
54. NILSSON J.H., 2003. Östersjöområdet. Studier av interaktion och barriärer. Meddelanden från Lunds universitets geografiska institution, avhandlingar 152, Lund: Sisyfos förlag.
64. Paasi A., 1986. The institutionalization of regions: A theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity. Fennia, vol. 164, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.11143/9052
49. Lieven A., 1994. The Baltic revolution. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the path to independence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
47. Lefebvre H., 1991. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell,
45. Krätke S., 1998. Regionale Integration oder fragmentierte Entwicklung? Die deutsch-polnische Grenzregion im Transformationsprozess. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw.1998.0007
59. North M., 2011. Geschichte der Ostsee: Handel und Kulturen. München: Verlag C.H. Beck.
29. Grix J., Knowles V., 2002. The euroregion as a Social Capital Maximizer: The German-Polish Euroregion Pro-Europa Viadrina. Regional & Federal Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 154-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/714004770
66. Paldam M., 2002. Udviklingen i Rusland, Polen og Baltikum. Lys forude efter ændringen af det økonomiske system. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
58. NORTH D., 1997. Institutionerna, tillväxten och välståndet. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
56. Nilsson J.H., 2015. Logistic revolutions and territorial change. Implications for the Baltic Sea region [in:] M. Grzechnik, H. Hurskainen (eds.), Beyond the Sea: Reviewing the manifold dimensions of water as barrier and bridge. Köln: Böhlau Verlag.
65. Paasi A., 1996. Territories, boundaries and consciousness. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
41. Kjellén R., 1899. Studier öfver Sveriges politiska gränser. Ymer, vol. 19, Stockholm.
35. Joenniemi P., Sergunin A., 2011. When two aspire to be one: City-twinning in northern Europe. Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp.231-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2011.641323
93. Więckowski M., Cerić D., 2016. Evolving tourism on the Baltic Sea coast: Perspectives on change on the Polish maritime borderland. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, vol. 16, supp. 1, pp. 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2016.1244598
86. UNWTO, 2012. Compendium of tourism statistics, data 2006-2010. http//:statistics.unwto.org [1 January2013].
89. Van Houtum H., Strüver A., 2002. Borders, strangers, doors and bridges. Space & Polity, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356257022000003590
38. Kant E., 1935. Bevölkerung und Lebensraum Estlands. Tartu: Postimees Trück.
51. Lundén T., Zalamans D., 2001. Local co-operation, ethnic diversity and state territoriality: The case of Haparanda and Tornio on the Sweden-Finland border. Geojournal, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021184430515
75. Scott J.W. (ed.), 2009. Bordering and ordering. The European neighbourhood: A critical perspective on EU territoriality and geopolitics. Trames, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 232-247. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2009.3.03
60. Novak P., 2011. The flexible territoriality of borders. Geopolitics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 741-767. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2010.494190
48. Lepik K-L., 2009. Euroregions as mechanisms for strengthening cross-order cooperation in the Baltic Sea region. Trames, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 265-284. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2009.3.05
46. LATVIJAS STATISTIKA, 2014. Centrālā statistikas pārvalde, Rīga, http://data.csb.gov.lv [27 March 2014].
33. Jauhiainen J.S., 2000. Regional development and regional policy. European Union and the Baltic Sea Region. Turko: Turko University.
84. TRAFIKANALYS, 2013. Luftfart 2012. http://www.trafa.se [18 March 2014].
12. Brunet-Jailly E., 2011. Special section: Borders, borderlands and theory: An introduction. Geopolitics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2010.493765
76. Shaw D.J.B., 1999. Russia in the modern world: A new geography. Oxford: Blackwell.
55. Nilsson J.H., 2009. Low-cost aviation [in:] S. Gössling, P. Upham (eds.), Climate change and aviation: Issues, challenges and solutions. London: Earthscan.
43. Komornicki T., Miszczuk A., 2010. Eastern Poland as the borderland of the European Union. Quaestiones Geographicae, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 55-69. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-010-0014-5
68. Ratzel F., 1923. Politische Geographie. München und Berlin: Verlag von R. Oldenburg.
63. O’Tuathail G., 1998. Political geography III: Dealing with deterritorialization. Progress in Human Geography, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298673827642
11. BRODIN A., 2000. Ports in transition in countries in transition: The changing situation for ports in Russia and the Baltic States in times of geopolitical and economical transition. Göteborg: Göteborg University: Department of Human and Economic Geography, Choros 2000:1.
77. Stålvant C-E., 1996. Actors around the Baltic Sea. Stockholm: Ministry for Foreign Affairs.
26. FLICK B.M., 2007. Air Baltic: The dynamic market in the eastern part of the European Community [in:] S. Gross, A. Schröder (eds.), Handbook of lowcost airlines: Strategies, business processes and market environment. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, pp. 111-122.
16. Derudder B., Devriendt L., Van Nuffel N., Witlox F., 2010. Geographies of business air travel in Europe [in:] J.V. Beaverstock, B. Derudder, J.R. Faulconbridge, F.Witlox (eds.), International business travel in the global economy, Farnham: Ashgate.
10. BOWEN J.T., 2010. A people set apart: The spatial development of airline business class services [in:] J.V. Beaverstock, B. Derudder, J.R. Faulconbridge, F.Witlox, (eds.), International business travel in the global economy, Farnham: Ashgate.
70. Schmitt P., Dubois A., 2008. Exploring the Baltic Sea region: On territorial capital and spatial integration. Stockholm: Nordregio.
40. Kisiel-Łowczyc A.B., 2000. Bałtycka integracja ekonomiczna. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
6. BALTIC TIMES, 11.11.2010. http://www.baltictimes.com [22 March 2011].
21. Dobruszkes F., 2009. New Europe, new low-cost air services. Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.05.005
13. Burghouwt G., Hakfoort J., 2001. The evolution of the European aviation network, 1990-1998. Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(01)00024-2
4. AVIATION WEEK, 8.9.2009. https://www.aviationweek.com [22 March 2011].
8. Bialasiewicz L., Dahlman C., Apuzzo G.M., Ciută F., Jones A. RUMFORD C., WODAK R., ANDERSON J., INGRAM A., 2009. Interventions in the new political geographies of European 'neighbourhood'. Political Geography, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.12.002
79. STATISTICS LITHUANIA, 2012. Statistical Yearbook of Lithuania 2012. http:// www.stat.gov.lt [25 March 2014].
2. Anderson J., O' Dowd L., 1999. Borders, border regions, and territoriality: Contradictory meanings, changing significance. Regional Studies, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 593-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950078648
87. Vanags A., 2011. Economic integration and cohesion in the Baltic Sea region: A critical perspective from the Baltic States. Journal of Baltic Studies, vol. 42, no. 1, pp.91-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2011.540805
5. Balibar E., 2009. Europe as borderland. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 190-215. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13008
91. VISIT ESTONIA, 2013. Tourism in Estonia 2013. http://www.visitestonia.com [27 March 2014].
78. STATISTICS ESTONIA, 2014. Homepage, http://www.stat.ee [24 March 2014].
22. Doganis R., 2006. The airline business. Second edition, London: Routledge.
3. ANDREFF M., ANDREFF W., 1995. Economic disintegration in Eastern Europe: Towards a new integration [in:] B. Dallago, G. Pegorotti (eds.), Integration and disintegration in European economies, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publ.
18. Derudder B., Witlox F., 2008. Mapping world city networks through airline flows: Context, relevance and problems. Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 305-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.12.005
28. Grigorev L. ABIGALOV S., 2011. The Baltic countries: Looking for a way out of the crisis. Problems of Economic Transition, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 20-42. https://doi.org/10.2753/PET1061-1991531202
69. Sassen S., 2001. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Second edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400847488
37. Kahila P., Roto J., Perjo L., Lange Scherbenske S., 2013. Cross-border labour mobility in the Central Baltic region. Nordregio Report 2013:2, Stockholm: Nordregio.
92. Wichmann Matthiessen C., 2004. International air traffic in the Baltic Sea Area: Hub-gateway status and prospects. Copenhagen in focus. Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.04.004
44. Kramsch O.T., 2003. The temporalit(ies) of European cross-border governance: Euregions and the problem of sens. Journal of Borderland Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2003.9695607
90. VASAB, 2010, Visions and strategies around the Baltic Sea 2010: Towards a framework for Spatial Development in the Baltic Sea Region. Karlskrona: Östersjöinstitutet.
36. Jönsson C., Tägil S., Törnqvist G., 2000. Organizing European space. London: Sage.
30. Gross S., Lück M., 2013. The low cost carrier worldwide. Abingdon: Ashgate.
34. Jensen O.B., Richardson T., 2004. Making European space: Mobility, power and territorial identity. London: Routledge.
24. Erlandsson U., 1998. Changes in air transportation concerning the Baltic states. Department of Social and Economic Geography. Lund University [unpublished paper].
72. Scott J.W., 2002. Baltic Sea regionalism, EU geopolitics and symbolic geographies of co-operation. Journal of Baltic Studies, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770200000021
73. Scott J.W. (ed.), 2006. EU enlargement, region building and shifting borders of inclusion and exclusion. Farnham: Ashgate.
23. Elden S., 2011. Thinking territory historically. Geopolitics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 757-761. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650041003717517
27. GERNER K., KARLSSON K-G., 2002. Nordens medelhav. Östersjöområdet som historia, myt och projekt. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
81. Taylor P.J., 2004. World city network: A global urban analysis. London: Routledge.
32. Ioannides D., Nielsen P.A., Billing P., 2006. Transboundary collaboration in tourism: The case of the Bothnian Arc. Tourism Geographies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 122-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616680600585380
57. Nilsson J.H., Eskilsson L., Ek R., 2010. Creating cross-border destinations: Interreg programmes and regionalisation in the Baltic Sea area. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250903561978
80. STATISTICS LITHUANIA, 2013. Tourism in Lithuania 2012. http:// www.tourism.lt [27 March 2014].
74. Scott J.W. (ed.), 2009. Decoding new regionalism. Shifting socio-political contexts in Central Europe and Latin America. Farnham: Ashgate.
20. DOBRINSKY R., ADAROV A., BORNUKOVA K., HAVLIK P., HUNYA G., KRUK D., PINDYUK O., 2016. The Belarus economy: The challenges of stalled reform. Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche. Research Report No. 413.
15. De Geer S., 1928. Das Geologische Fennoskandia und das Geographische Baltoskandia. Geografiska Annaler, vol. 10, pp. 119-139. https://doi.org/10.2307/519787
53. Nilsson J.H., 2000. Utrikeshandeln i Östersjöområdet. Rapporter och Notiser, 159. Lund: Lund University. Institutionen för kulturgeografi och ekonomisk geografi.
14. Christauskas J., Stanaitis J., 2008. Dynamics of passenger traffic flow at Vilnius, Riga, Tallinn and Krakow airports. Aviation, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 28-32. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648-7788.2008.12.28-32
82. Timothy D.J., Saarinen J., 2013. Cross-border cooperation and tourism in Europe [in:] C. Costa, E. Panyik, D. Buhalis D. (eds.), Trends in European tourism planning and organisation. Bristol: Channel View Publications.
85. TRANSPORTSTYRELSEN, 2012. Planerat utbud i linjefart på svenska flygplatser. Oktober 2012. http://www.transportstyrelsen.se/Global/Luftfart [25 March 2014].
52. Mann M., 1993. Nation-states in Europe and other continents: Diversifying, developing, not dying. Daedalus, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 115-140.
9. Böhme H., Laaser C-F., Sichelschmidt H., Soltwedel R., 1998. Transports in the Baltic Sea region: Perspectives for the economies in transition. Kiel: Stockholm Chamber of Commerce.
71. Schönweitz M., 2015. The Öresund region. Between utopia and reality [in:] M. Grzechnik, H. Hurskainen (eds.), Beyond the Sea: Reviewing the manifold dimensions of water as barrier and bridge. Köln: Böhlau Verlag, pp. 165-185.
88. Van Houtum H., 2000. III European perspectives on borderlands: An overview of European geographical research on borders and border regions. Journal of Borderland Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 57-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2000.9695542
17. DERUDDER B., VAN NUFFEL N., WITLOX F., 2009. Connecting the world: Analyzing global city networks through airline flows [in:] S. Cwerner, S. Kesselring, J. Urry (eds.), Aeromobilities, London: Routledge.
7. Bialasiewicz L. (ed.), 2011. Europe in the World. EU geopolitics and the making of European space. Farnham: Ashgate.
62. OAG WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDES, 2000-2012. October issues.
Geographia Polonica
83. Timothy D.J., Saarinen J., Viken A., 2016. Editorial: Tourism issues and international borders in the Nordic Region. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, vol. 16, suppl. 1, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2016.1244504
Opis:: The geo-political transition in 1989-91 had long term consequences for the European integration process. The integration and regionalisation processes following the transition resulted in a transformation of territorial borders in and around the region; the functions of the borders changed. Mobility is vital for these processes. This paper is based on a longitudinal study of the development of air traffic from airports in the eastern part of the Baltic Sea Region, 2000-2012. The purpose of the paper is to discuss how the development of infrastructure and transport networks influence regionalisation processes in the Baltic Sea Region. Firstly, the impact of macro-economic development as a driver of internationalisation in the region is analysed, thereafter the relationship between institutional transition and regional system development. There are three periods of large increase in traffic from the Baltic States towards Western Europe, related to institutional change: rapidly after independence, as a result of the enlargement of the European Union, and related to the emergence of low-cost aviation. Aviation from Minsk and Kaliningrad have also shown substantial increase in air traffic, but mainly to other parts of the former Soviet Union. There is thus little evidence of a regionalisation process involving the whole region.
24 cm
Dostawca treści:: RCIN - Repozytorium Cyfrowe Instytutów Naukowych

Książka

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 6.

Tytuł:: Standardy i zasady międzynarodowego prawa morskiego jako instrumenty przywracania integralności terytorialnej Ukrainy i jej granic
The Rules and Principles of Modern International Law of the Sea as a Toolkit for Restoring the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine and Its Borders
Autorzy:: Szevczuk, Taras
Tematy:: międzynarodowe prawo morskie
integralność terytorialna
nienaruszalność granic
Konwencja ONZ o prawie morza z 1982 r.
international law of the sea
territorial integrity
the inviolability of the borders
the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982; Pokaż więcej
Wydawca:: Stowarzyszenie Absolwentów i Przyjaciół Wydziału Prawa Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/22792717.pdf Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
Opis:: Na początku 2014 r. Rosja, poprzez agresję zbrojną, naruszając podstawowe zasady i normy prawa międzynarodowego, zaanektowała Krym i przybrzeżne obszary morskie Ukrainy. Dnia 26 września 2018 r. na 73. sesji Zgromadzenia Ogólnego ONZ Prezydent Ukrainy P. Poroszenko powiedział, że Rosja nie zamierza zatrzymywać się nad tym i chce zająć Morze Azowskie, a po wybudowaniu mostu Kerczeńskiego zaczęła systematycznie naruszać swobodę żeglugi międzynarodowej dla ukraińskich i zagranicznych statków. W odpowiedzi na agresję Rosji, Ukraina stosuje odpowiednie środki zaradcze, które są dopuszczalne na mocy prawa międzynarodowego i poszukuje sposobów i środków na skuteczniejsze wyjście ze skomplikowanej sytuacji. Międzynarodowe prawo morskie, którego podstawowym elementem jest Konwencja ONZ o prawie morza z 1982 r., posiada skuteczne narzędzie, którego użycie umożliwi Ukrainie zwrot utraconego terytorium, skutecznie przeciwdziałać Rosji i przenosić ją na międzynarodową odpowiedzialność prawną.
In early 2014, Russia, through armed aggression, violating the fundamental principles and rules of international law, annexed the Crimea and the coastal marine areas of Ukraine. Modern international law of the sea, the basic element of which is the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, has an effective toolkit, the use of which will enable Ukraine to return the lost territories, effectively counteract Russia and bring it to international legal responsibility.
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "sea borders" wg kryterium: Temat