Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Pedagogiczna Biblioteka Wojewódzka im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Lublinie Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaPedagogiczna Biblioteka Wojewódzka im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Lublinie
Zmień bibliotekę

Wyszukujesz frazę "syncellus" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
    Tytuł:
    Theodore Syncellus and the 626 Siege of Constantinople
    Autorzy:
    Whitby, Michael
    Tematy:
    Theodore Syncellus
    Constantinople
    Avars
    626 Siege
    Patriarch Sergius
    Virgin Mary
    George of Pisidia
    Old Testament exegesis
    Pokaż więcej
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/52405171.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
    Opis:
    The homily on the Avar siege of Constantinople in 626 attributed to Theodore Syncellus shares numerous linguistic features both with Theodore’s homily of 623 on the Virgin’s Robe and with George of Pisidia’s poem of 626/7 on the siege. Theodore and George both celebrate the combined efforts of Patriarch Sergius and the Virgin Mary in saving the city, but Theodore also highlights the involvement of other agents, in particular the patrician Bonus and the young Heraclius Constantine, who were jointly in charge of the city while Emperor Heraclius was campaigning against the Persians. The homily is structured around the exegesis of three Old Testament passages: the promise in Isaiah 7 to King Ahaz about the salvation of Jerusalem; the analysis of numbers in Zachariah 8.19; and God’s destruction of Gog and Magog in Ezekiel 38–39.
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Theodore Syncellus and the 626 siege of Constantinople
    Autorzy:
    Whitby, Michael
    Opis:
    The homily on the Avar siege of Constantinople in 626 attributed to Theodore Syncellus shares numerous linguistic features both with Theodore’s homily of 623 on the Virgin’s Robe and with George of Pisidia’s poem of 626/7 on the siege. Theodore and George both celebrate the combined efforts of Patriarch Sergius and the Virgin Mary in saving the city, but Theodore also highlights the involvement of other agents, in particular the patrician Bonus and the young Heraclius Constantine, who were jointly in charge of the city while Emperor Heraclius was campaigning against the Persians. The homily is structured around the exegesis of three Old Testament passages: the promise in Isaiah 7 to King Ahaz about the salvation of Jerusalem; the analysis of numbers in Zachariah 8.19; and God’s destruction of Gog and Magog in Ezekiel 38–39.
    Dostawca treści:
    Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wpływ ustroju prawnego Kościoła łacińskiego na kształtowanie się aktualnego porządku prawnego katolickich Kościołów wschodnich na przykładzie urzędów protosyncela i syncela
    Influence of the Legal System of the Latin Church on Formation of the Current Legal Order of the Eastern Catholic Churches as Illustrated by the Offices of protosyncellus and syncellus
    Autorzy:
    Bakalarz, Mariusz
    Tematy:
    syncel
    protosyncel
    wikariusz generalny
    wikariusz biskupi
    katolickie Kościoły wschodnie
    Kościół łaciński
    latynizacja
    syncellus
    protosyncellus
    general vicar
    episcopal vicar
    Catholic Eastern Churches
    Latin Church
    latinization
    Pokaż więcej
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1897177.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
    Opis:
    Urząd wikariusza generalnego powstał w Kościele zachodnim w XII w. Stopniowo jego władza umacniała się, aż stał się urzędem obligatoryjnym i głównym współpracownikiem biskupa diecezjalnego w zarządzie Kościołem partykularnym. Podczas przygotowań Soboru Watykańskiego II dostrzeżono potrzebę utworzenia nowej instytucji w strukturze Kościoła partykularnego. Obok urzędu wikariusza generalnego, ustanowiono urząd wikariusza biskupiego – nową funkcję o zbieżnej naturze prawnej i kompetencjach, ale przeznaczoną do wspierania biskupa diecezjalnego w poszczególnych aspektach jego działalności. W Kościele wschodnim powstał zwyczaj wybierania biskupów spośród zakonników. Biskupi chcieli nadal prowadzić życie monastyczne. Dobierali sobie współtowarzyszy, którzy zamieszkiwali wspólnie z biskupem w jego mieszkaniu. Tego towarzysza życia biskupa określano mianem synkellios, co w wersji łacińskiej uzyskało formę syncellus. Syncel był nie tylko współtowarzyszem życia biskupa, ale także wspomagał go w jego funkcjach, a nawet reprezentował biskupa w wielu sprawach kościelnych, przez co uzyskał znaczący wpływ w Kościele lokalnym. Unie zawierane z Kościołami uznającymi zwierzchność Biskupa Rzymu, wiązały się także z przyjęciem przez nie łacińskiego systemu prawa kościelnego i form strukturalnych istniejących w Kościele zachodnim. Jednym z elementów tego dziedzictwa jurydycznego był urząd wikariusza generalnego. W motu proprio Piusa XII Cleri sanctitati i Kodeksie Kanonów Kościołów Wschodnich rozwiązania te zostały ugruntowane. Wprowadzono urzędy wikariusza generalnego i wikariusza biskupiego, nadając im starożytne nazwy syncela i protosyncela.
    The office of vicar general was created in the Western Church in the 12th century. Gradually, his authority was strengthened until the office became mandatory and he became the main collaborator of the diocesan bishop in the administrative body of the particular Church. During the preparation of the Second Vatican Council the need to establish a newinstitution within the structure of particular Churches was recognized. In addition to the office of vicar general, the office of episcopal vicar was created – a new function with a similar legal characteristics and competences, but intended to support the diocesan bishop in specific aspects of his activity. In the Eastern Church, it was customary to choose bishops from among religious. Bishops wanted to continue their monastic life. A bishop would choose a fellow man who lived with him in home. Such a life companion was known as synkellios, which in Latin was rendered as syncellus. A syncellus was not only a companion of the bishop’s life but also assisted him in his functions and even represented him in many ecclesiastical matters, which made the syncellus a significant figure in the local Church. The unions concluded with Churches that recognized the supremacy of the Bishop of Rome were also associated with their adoption of the Latin system of ecclesiastical law and structural forms existing in the Western Church. One of the elements of this juridical heritage was the office of vicar general. These solutions were laid down in Pius XII’s motu proprio Cleri sanctitati and the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches . The offices of vicar general and episcopal vicar were introducted and assigned the ancient names of syncellus and protosyncellus.
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Gnesioi filoi: the Search for George Syncellus’ and Theophanes the Confessor’s Own Words, and the Authorship of Their Oeuvre
    Autorzy:
    Kompa, Andrzej
    Tematy:
    Theophanes Confessor
    George Syncellus
    Georgios Synkellos
    Byzantine chronography
    Chronographia
    Ekloge chronographias
    gnesios filos
    friendship
    historia tripartita
    TLG
    world chronicles
    aphormai, prophemi
    hos proephen
    kathos kai proephen
    hos proephemen
    Pokaż więcej
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/682328.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
    Opis:
    In a nutshell: 1. I believe that Ekloge Chronographias of George Syncellus and Chronographia of Theophanes the Confessor should be treated as a single project, undertaken in turn by two authors; 2. There are important stylistic differences between the two parts, noticeable in the fragments, in which the authors deliver some editorial remarks or disclose their personal opinions; from a wider selection of such phrases, references to the past or future such as ‘as I have mentioned/as I said/as have been said/as we demonstrated above, etc.’, being diverse and individual, are especially helpful. 3. This observation is of great use not only for the texts analysed here, it may be used to confirm authorship of many other texts. 4. As for George and Theophanes, the TLG search of such structures in all extant classical Greek and Byzantine output confirms the statement nr 1, with clauses like ὡς προέφην/καθὼς καὶ προέφην/ὡς προέφημεν/καθὼς προέφημεν both rare in the whole preserved corpus, and relatively often used by the author of Chronographia. The style of the proemium of Chronographia fits the rest of the work and differs from Ekloge Chronographias. 5. Precise analysis of a wider group of similar clauses shows that Ekloge Chronographias and Chronographia were written by two different authors; Chronographia was created by one author, distinctive and independent, no matter how reproductive at the same time he was. I see no convincing arguments not to call this author Theophanes. Some later and partial editiorial interventions to Chronographia, conceivable (rubrics?) and in some instances even certain, do not challenge this view. 6. Only a few entries from the initial parts of Chronographia fit more the George’s work; their style and content bear much more similarities with Ekloge (in AM 5796, 5814, 5818, 5827, 5828). These paragraphs, George’s aphormai, probably in form of loose notes, were inserted to Chronographia by its author the same way as he used his sources for the subsequent parts; they did not reach beyond the times of Constantine I. 7. I do not dismiss the message of the proemium to the Chronographia as it is much more credible than the discussion, sometimes hypercritical, on the vitae and the scraps of the Confessor’s biography. I see no reason not to believe that the idea established and developed by George was then taken over by his friend; the differences result from the independent work of the former and then of the latter, presumably with only rudimentary guidance at the beginning. 8. The ‘genuine friendship’, the crucial relation between the two authors is still the most useful key to understand the history of the tripartita – therefore, I analyse it in the final part of the paper.
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Adversus Iudaeos in the Sermon Written by Theodore Syncellus on the Avar Siege of AD 626
    Autorzy:
    Hurbanič, Martin
    Tematy:
    Avars
    Constantinople
    Theodore Syncellus
    De obsidione avarica Constantinopolis
    patriarch Sergius
    the Avar Siege of 626
    typology
    Jews
    Gog and Magog
    New Jerusalem
    Old Testament prophecies
    eschatology
    the last war of Antiquity
    Pokaż więcej
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/682453.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
    Opis:
    A sermon attributed to Theodore Syncellus (Theodoros Synkellos) is considered as one of the basic sources for the study of the Avar siege of Constantinople in AD 626. Therefore, the most historians paid more attention to the analysis of its historical background than to its ideological content. From the ideological point of view, the document serves as an evidence that a fear for the future of the Empire and its capital Constantinople began to rise within emerging Byzantine society. The Avar siege served its author mainly as a model for developing his polemics with imaginary Jewish opponents and their religion. It deserves to be included in a long succession of similar polemical treatises, which have existed in Christianity from its earliest times.
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Gnesioi filoi: George Syncellus and Theophanes the Confessor – Addenda
    Autorzy:
    Kompa, Andrzej
    Tematy:
    Theophanes the Confessor
    George Syncellus
    Georgios Synkellos
    Byzantine chronography
    Byzantine historiography
    Chronographia
    Ekloge chronographias
    gnesios philos
    TLG
    world chronicles
    hos proephen
    kathos kai proephen
    hos proephemen
    hos ephen
    hos ephemen
    ὡς προέφην
    καθὼς καὶ προέφην
    ὡς προέφημεν
    καθὼς προέφημεν
    ὡς ἔφην
    ὡς ἔφημεν
    stylometry
    Pokaż więcej
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/26469788.pdf  Link otwiera się w nowym oknie
    Opis:
    The paper provides the addenda to A. Kompa, Gnesioi filoi: the search for George Syncellus’ and Theophanes the Confessor’s own words, and the authorship of their oeuvre, Studia Ceranea 5, 2015, p. 155–230. All the expressions crucial to the stylistic and stylometric argument on the authorship of the Chronography of Theophanes have been updated after 7 years and verified in the expanded TLG database. The updated results are presented below. The conclusions confirm the previous opinions on the individual, singular authorship of the chronicle of Theophanes with differences in style from the first part of the universal history, written by George Syncellus. At the same time, both works should be treated as a single project, and the prooimion to Theophanes’ part as a sound base faor the reconstruction of the writing process. The clauses ὡς προέφην, καθὼς καὶ προέφην, ὡς προέφημεν, and καθὼς προέφημεν are specific to the Chronography of Theophanes in their frequency and diversity, but they seem to be known and used by the circles from which Theophanes acquired his literary skills.
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies